Literature DB >> 22288691

Feature assignment in perception of auditory figure.

Melissa K Gregg1, Arthur G Samuel2.   

Abstract

Because the environment often includes multiple sounds that overlap in time, listeners must segregate a sound of interest (the auditory figure) from other co-occurring sounds (the unattended auditory ground). We conducted a series of experiments to clarify the principles governing the extraction of auditory figures. We distinguish between auditory "objects" (relatively punctate events, such as a dog's bark) and auditory "streams" (sounds involving a pattern over time, such as a galloping rhythm). In Experiments 1 and 2, on each trial 2 sounds-an object (a vowel) and a stream (a series of tones)-were presented with 1 target feature that could be perceptually grouped with either source. In each block of these experiments, listeners were required to attend to 1 of the 2 sounds, and report its perceived category. Across several experimental manipulations, listeners were more likely to allocate the feature to an impoverished object if the result of the grouping was a good, identifiable object. Perception of objects was quite sensitive to feature variation (noise masking), whereas perception of streams was more robust to feature variation. In Experiment 3, the number of sound sources competing for the feature was increased to 3. This produced a shift toward relying more on spatial cues than on the potential contribution of the feature to an object's perceptual quality. The results support a distinction between auditory objects and streams, and provide new information about the way that the auditory world is parsed. (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22288691      PMCID: PMC3342414          DOI: 10.1037/a0026789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  20 in total

1.  Hearing shape.

Authors:  A J Kunkler-Peck; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Stream segregation and the illusion of overlap.

Authors:  G L Dannenbring; A S Bregman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The importance of semantics in auditory representations.

Authors:  Melissa K Gregg; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Duplex perception: a comparison of monosyllables and slamming doors.

Authors:  C A Fowler; L D Rosenblum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Vowel quality changes produced by surrounding tone sequences.

Authors:  C J Darwin; H Pattison; R B Gardner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-04

6.  Speech perception takes precedence over nonspeech perception.

Authors:  D H Whalen; A M Liberman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-07-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones.

Authors:  A S Bregman; J Campbell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-08

8.  On the perceptual organization of speech.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Philip E Rubin; Stefanie M Berns; Jennifer S Pardo; Jessica M Lang
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 9.  Auditory and linguistic processes in speech perception: inferences from six fusions in dichotic listening.

Authors:  J E Cutting
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Competition among auditory streaming, dichotic fusion, and diotic fusion.

Authors:  H Steiger; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  Rapid Context-based Identification of Target Sounds in an Auditory Scene.

Authors:  Marissa L Gamble; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.225

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.