Literature DB >> 19894834

Localization interference between components in an auditory scene.

Adrian K C Lee1, Ade Deane-Pratt, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham.   

Abstract

Some past studies suggest that when sound elements are heard as one object, the spatial cues in the component elements are integrated to determine perceived location, and that this integration is reduced when the elements are perceived in separate objects. The current study explored how object localization depends on the spatial, spectral, and temporal configurations of sound elements in an auditory scene. Localization results are interpreted in light of results from a series of previous experiments studying perceptual grouping of the same stimuli, e.g., Shinn-Cunningham et al. [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 12223-12227 (2007)]. The current results suggest that the integration (pulling) of spatial information across spectrally interleaved elements is obligatory when these elements are simultaneous, even though past results show that these simultaneous sound elements are not grouped strongly into a single perceptual object. In contrast, perceptually distinct objects repel (push) each other spatially with a strength that decreases as the temporal separation between competing objects increases. These results show that the perceived location of an attended object is not easily predicted by knowledge of how sound elements contribute to the perceived spectro-temporal content of that object.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19894834      PMCID: PMC2787073          DOI: 10.1121/1.3238240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  41 in total

1.  Binaural sluggishness in the perception of tone sequences and speech in noise.

Authors:  J F Culling; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Rhodri Cusack; John Deeks; Genevieve Aikman; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Test of a model of auditory object formation using intensity and interaural time difference discrimination.

Authors:  W S Woods; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A sound element gets lost in perceptual competition.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Adrian K C Lee; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Object-based auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Auditory grouping.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Perceptual segregation of a harmonic from a vowel by interaural time difference and frequency proximity.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R W Hukin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation.

Authors:  R P Carlyon; R Cusack; J M Foxton; I H Robertson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Image fusion, broadening, and displacement in sound location.

Authors:  M B Gardner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of frequency disparities on trading of an ambiguous tone between two competing auditory objects.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences.

Authors:  Andrew Schwartz; Josh H McDermott; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Dissociation of perceptual judgments of "what" and "where" in an ambiguous auditory scene.

Authors:  Andrew H Schwartz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Localizing the sources of two independent noises: role of time varying amplitude differences.

Authors:  William A Yost; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Six Degrees of Auditory Spatial Separation.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Alex Fox; Emily Orchard-Mills; Johahn Leung; David Alais
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-31

5.  Nothing is irrelevant in a noisy world: sensory illusions reveal obligatory within-and across-modality integration.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Difference in precedence effect between children and adults signifies development of sound localization abilities in complex listening tasks.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Shelly P Godar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Neurons in primary auditory cortex represent sound source location in a cue-invariant manner.

Authors:  Katherine C Wood; Stephen M Town; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.