Literature DB >> 18506443

Evaluation of accuracy of an electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation system in total knee arthroplasty.

A J Graydon1, S Malak, I A Anderson, R P Pitto.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop a method to assess the accuracy of an electromagnetic technology image-free navigation system for total knee arthroplasty in a leg with normal or abnormal mechanical alignment. An acrylic phantom leg was constructed to simulate tibia and femur deformation. Determination of actual leg alignment was achieved using a digital caliper unit. In the setting of normal alignment, the mean error of the system characterised as the difference between the measured computer navigation and digital caliper angles ranged between 0.8 degrees (frontal plane) and 1.5 degrees (lateral plane). In the setting of abnormal alignment, the mean error ranged between 0.4 degrees (frontal plane) and 1.6 degrees (lateral plane). Deformity had no demonstrable effect on accuracy. The study demonstrates satisfactory in vitro system accuracy in both normal and abnormal leg mechanical alignment settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18506443      PMCID: PMC2898975          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0586-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  18 in total

1.  Experimental assessment of precision and accuracy of radiostereometric analysis for the determination of polyethylene wear in a total hip replacement model.

Authors:  Charles R Bragdon; Henrik Malchau; Xunhua Yuan; Rebecca Perinchief; Johan Kärrholm; Niclas Börlin; Daniel M Estok; William H Harris
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.601

Review 3.  Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: do we need CAOS?

Authors:  J M Sikorski; S Chauhan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-04

4.  Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  M Sparmann; B Wolke; H Czupalla; D Banzer; A Zink
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-08

5.  Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment.

Authors:  Jan Victor; Davy Hoste
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements.

Authors:  Frederick W Werner; David C Ayers; Lorin P Maletsky; Paul J Rullkoetter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rolf G Haaker; Martin Stockheim; Michael Kamp; Gunnar Proff; Johannes Breitenfelder; Andreas Ottersbach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Initial experience with electromagnetic navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a radiographic comparative study.

Authors:  Rodney K Alan; Michael S Shin; Alfred J Tria
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation.

Authors:  R Hart; M Janecek; A Chaker; P Bucek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival.

Authors:  M A Ritter; P M Faris; E M Keating; J B Meding
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Computer assisted navigation in knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-12-01

2.  Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies.

Authors:  Yaron S Brin; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Lawrence Joseph; David J Zukor; John Antoniou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Assessment and validation of CT scanogram to compare per-operative and post-operative mechanical axis after navigated total knee replacement.

Authors:  Paraskumar Mohanlal; Sunil Jain
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Immediate recovery room radiographs after primary total knee arthroplasty-why do we keep doing them?

Authors:  Yona Kosashvili; Mansour Alvi; Ian P Mayne; Oleg Safir; Alan Gross; David Backstein
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The effect of pelvic movement on the accuracy of hip centre location acquired using an imageless navigation system.

Authors:  Sebastien Lustig; Cyrille Fleury; Elvire Servien; Guillaume Demey; Philippe Neyret; Simon T Donell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Pinless navigation in total knee arthroplasty: navigation reduced by the maximum?

Authors:  Günther Maderbacher; Jens Schaumburger; Armin Keshmiri; Magdalena Barthel; Hans-Robert Springorum; Benjamin Craiovan; Joachim Grifka; Clemens Baier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Measurement of lower limb alignment: there are within-person differences between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing measurement modalities.

Authors:  Daphne A L Schoenmakers; Peter Z Feczko; Bert Boonen; Martijn G M Schotanus; Nanne P Kort; Pieter J Emans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.342

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.