Literature DB >> 21221574

The effect of pelvic movement on the accuracy of hip centre location acquired using an imageless navigation system.

Sebastien Lustig1, Cyrille Fleury, Elvire Servien, Guillaume Demey, Philippe Neyret, Simon T Donell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of an imageless navigation system in localising the hip centre and to evaluate the effect of pelvic movement on the accuracy of hip centre acquisition.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A phantom leg was constructed to simulate the hip joint and upper femur. A 3D measurement device was used to measure precisely the co-ordinates of hip centre. A limber link simulated hip motion as used when defining the hip centre during computer-assisted surgery. The data generated by the 3D measurement device and the image-free navigation system was compared with increasing amounts of simulated pelvic movement.
RESULTS: For moderate pelvic movement (5 mm) the mean error of the hip centre ranged between 1.5 mm and 3.9 mm with a corresponding angular error of between 0.25° and 0.64°. In conditions of excessive pelvic movement (15 mm) the mean error was 11.7 mm corresponding to an angular error of 1.9°.
CONCLUSION: This in vitro study showed accurate acquisition of the centre of hip with a surgical navigation system. These data suggest that during TKA using this computer assisted navigation system, the accuracy of insertion will not be significantly affected by moderate pelvic movement during data acquisition.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21221574      PMCID: PMC3193957          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1194-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  21 in total

1.  Accurate determination of a joint rotation center based on the minimal amplitude point method.

Authors:  Frédéric Marin; Henrich Mannel; Lutz Claes; Lutz Dürselen
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2003

2.  Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial.

Authors:  S K Chauhan; R G Scott; W Breidahl; R J Beaver
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

3.  [Accuracy of determination of the hip centre in navigated total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  G Matziolis; D Krocker; S Tohtz; U Weiss; C Perka
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

4.  Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment.

Authors:  Jan Victor; Davy Hoste
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Detection of the center of the hip joint in computer-assisted surgery: an evaluation study of the Surgetics algorithm.

Authors:  Eric Stindel; Daniel Gil; Jean-Louis Briard; Philippe Merloz; Frédéric Dubrana; Christian Lefevre
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2005-05

6.  Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system for total knee replacement.

Authors:  R P Pitto; A J Graydon; L Bradley; S F Malak; C G Walker; I A Anderson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-05

7.  Pelvic tracker effects on hip center accuracy using imageless navigation.

Authors:  William M Mihalko; Matthew J Phillips; Zair Fishkin; Kenneth A Krackow
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2006-07

8.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement.

Authors:  R S Jeffery; R W Morris; R A Denham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

9.  Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation.

Authors:  Ralf Decking; Yma Markmann; Johannes Fuchs; Wolfhart Puhl; Hanns-Peter Scharf
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival.

Authors:  M A Ritter; P M Faris; E M Keating; J B Meding
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  Appropriate sagittal femoral component alignment cannot be ensured by intramedullary alignment rods.

Authors:  Günther Maderbacher; Jens Schaumburger; Clemens Baier; Florian Zeman; Hans-Robert Springorum; Anne-Maria Birkenbach; Joachim Grifka; Armin Keshmiri
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  What is the optimal valgus pre-set for intramedullary femoral alignment rods in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  G Maderbacher; A Keshmiri; J Schaumburger; F Zeman; A M Birkenbach; B Craiovan; J Grifka; C Baier
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty does not match the pre-operative plan as assessed by intra-operative computer-assisted navigation.

Authors:  Corey Scholes; Varun Sahni; Sebastien Lustig; David A Parker; Myles R J Coolican
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Patient-specific positioning guides for total knee arthroplasty: no significant difference between final component alignment and pre-operative digital plan except for tibial rotation.

Authors:  Bert Boonen; Martijn G M Schotanus; Bart Kerens; Frans-Jan Hulsmans; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Nanne P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of a Next Generation Computer-Assisted Surgical System.

Authors:  Laurent D Angibaud; Yifei Dai; Ralph A Liebelt; Bo Gao; Scott W Gulbransen; Xeve S Silver
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-05-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.