Literature DB >> 18696064

Assessment and validation of CT scanogram to compare per-operative and post-operative mechanical axis after navigated total knee replacement.

Paraskumar Mohanlal1, Sunil Jain.   

Abstract

Our objective was to assess and validate low-dose computed tomography (CT) scanogram as a post-operative imaging modality to measure the mechanical axis after navigated total knee replacement. A prospective study was performed to compare intra-operative and post-operative mechanical axis after navigated total knee replacements. All consecutive patients who underwent navigated total knee replacement between May and December 2006 were included. The intra-operative final axis was recorded, and post-operatively a CT scanogram of lower limbs was performed. The mechanical axis was measured and compared against the intra-operative measurement. There were 15 patients ranging in age from 57 to 80 (average 70) years. The average final intra-operative axis was 0.56 degrees varus (4 degrees varus to 1.5 degrees valgus) and post-operative CT scanogram axis was 0.52 degrees varus (3.1 degrees varus to 1.8 degrees valgus). The average deviation from final axes to CT scanogram axes was 0.12 degrees valgus with a correlation coefficient of 0.9. Our study suggests that CT scanogram is an imaging modality with reasonable accuracy for measuring mechanical axis despite significantly low radiation. It also confirms a high level of correlation between intra-operative and post-operative mechanical axis after navigated total knee replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18696064      PMCID: PMC2899077          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0639-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  17 in total

1.  Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol).

Authors:  S K Chauhan; G W Clark; S Lloyd; R G Scott; W Breidahl; J M Sikorski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08

2.  Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment.

Authors:  Jan Victor; Davy Hoste
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rolf G Haaker; Martin Stockheim; Michael Kamp; Gunnar Proff; Johannes Breitenfelder; Andreas Ottersbach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Optimising femoral component rotation using Equiflex instrumentation: a clinical review.

Authors:  Ranjith R Kuzhupilly; Ilias Seferiadis; Iain A C Lennox
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement.

Authors:  R S Jeffery; R W Morris; R A Denham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

6.  Restoration of limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and methods.

Authors:  D E Jessup; R L Worland; C Clelland; J Arredondo
Journal:  J South Orthop Assoc       Date:  1997

7.  Alignment and long-term clinical results of a semiconstrained knee prosthesis.

Authors:  B Jonsson; J Aström
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement.

Authors:  P A Lotke; M L Ecker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement. The imperial knee protocol.

Authors:  J Henckel; R Richards; K Lozhkin; S Harris; F M Rodriguez y Baena; A R W Barrett; J P Cobb
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-11

10.  Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A Rand; M B Coventry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  3 in total

1.  A cadaver study comparing intraoperative methods to analyze lower limb alignment.

Authors:  Nael Hawi; Emmanouil Liodakis; Eduardo M Suero; Rupert Meller; Musa Citak; Christian Krettek
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Bradley S Ellison; Jinjun Zhu; Erin L Ruh; Stephen M Howell; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The impact of limb loading and the measurement modality (2D versus 3D) on the measurement of the limb loading dependent lower extremity parameters.

Authors:  Lukas Jud; Tabitha Roth; Philipp Fürnstahl; Lazaros Vlachopoulos; Reto Sutter; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.