Literature DB >> 31117057

Two-crossed-polarizers based optical property modulation method for ionizing radiation detection for positron emission tomography.

Yuli Wang1, Yingjie Li, Fei Yi, Junyu Li, Siwei Xie, Qiyu Peng, Jianfeng Xu.   

Abstract

Recent work shows that Pockels effect and optics pump-probe measurement could be utilized as a novel method for 511 keV ionizing radiation photon detection for positron emission tomography (PET) which could potentially overcome the inherent physical limitation for coincidence time resolution of around 100 ps (Tao et al 2016 Phys. Med. Biol. 61 7600-22). In this paper, we embrace this observation and introduce a two-crossed-polarizers based setup to achieve similar detection concept, which is a simpler and more compact setup with comparable ionizing radiation detection capability as the setup used in the previously proposed work. We evaluated the performance of our experimental setup with Lithium Niobate (LiNbO3) and Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) detector crystals, and the desired properties of an ideal detector crystal were discussed. The modulation signal induced by 511 keV photons in both LiNbO3 and CdTe can be detected with repeatable signal amplitude using two-crossed-polarizers based method, while CdTe could provide eight times higher detection sensitivity to 511 keV photons than LiNbO3 under the same bias voltage, suggesting high effective Z number and high density properties of CdTe, as well as a shorter carrier lifetime and lower carrier mobility of LiNbO3. In addition, the strength of modulation signal increased linearly with bias voltage before saturation. The modulation signal strength in LiNbO3 continued to increase after 2000 V due to its high resistivity which could reduce the dark current in the detector, while the modulation signal of CdTe with low resistivity tended to be saturated at a bias voltage higher than 1200 V. Therefore, further increasing the bias voltage for detector crystals (especially for LiNbO3) may enhance the modulation strength and improve the detection sensitivity for annihilation photons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31117057      PMCID: PMC6692086          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab23cb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  16 in total

1.  Radiation dose to PET technologists and strategies to lower occupational exposure.

Authors:  Fiona O Roberts; Dishan H Gunawardana; Kunthi Pathmaraj; Anthony Wallace; Paul L U; Tian Mi; Sam U Berlangieri; Graeme J O'Keefe; Chris C Rowe; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2005-03

2.  Direct time-of-flight for quantitative, real-time in-beam PET: a concept and feasibility study.

Authors:  Paulo Crespo; Georgy Shakirin; Fine Fiedler; Wolfgang Enghardt; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Benefit of time-of-flight in PET: experimental and clinical results.

Authors:  Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Gerd Muehllehner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution.

Authors:  Maurizio Conti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Sub-100 ps coincidence time resolution for positron emission tomography with LSO:Ce codoped with Ca.

Authors:  Mythra Varun Nemallapudi; Stefan Gundacker; Paul Lecoq; Etiennette Auffray; Alessandro Ferri; Alberto Gola; Claudio Piemonte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Evaluation of image reconstruction algorithms encompassing Time-Of-Flight and Point Spread Function modelling for quantitative cardiac PET: phantom studies.

Authors:  L Presotto; L Gianolli; M C Gilardi; V Bettinardi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Study of material properties important for an optical property modulation-based radiation detection method for positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Li Tao; Henry M Daghighian; Craig S Levin
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-02-01

8.  Towards time-of-flight PET with a semiconductor detector.

Authors:  Gerard Ariño-Estrada; Gregory S Mitchell; Sun Il Kwon; Junwei Du; Hadong Kim; Leonard J Cirignano; Kanai S Shah; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Time-of-flight PET/CT using low-activity protocols: potential implications for cancer therapy monitoring.

Authors:  Iain Murray; Antonis Kalemis; Joe Glennon; Syed Hasan; Shuaib Quraishi; Thomas Beyer; Norbert Avril
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  The imaging performance of a LaBr3-based PET scanner.

Authors:  M E Daube-Witherspoon; S Surti; A Perkins; C C M Kyba; R Wiener; M E Werner; R Kulp; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  1 in total

1.  Further investigations of a radiation detector based on ionization-induced modulation of optical polarization.

Authors:  Yuli Wang; Li Tao; Shiva Abbaszadeh; Craig Levin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.609

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.