Literature DB >> 18450071

Overshadowing as a function of trial number: dynamics of first- and second-order comparator effects.

Steven Stout1, Francisco Arcediano, Martha Escobar, Ralph R Miller.   

Abstract

In two conditioned lick suppression experiments with rats, we examined the permanence of the overshadowing effect as a function of the number of compound reinforced training trials. In Experiment 1, robust overshadowing was observed following 4 compound-US pairings but dissipated with 36 pairings. Overshadowing decreased because responding to the overshadowed stimulus increased, not because responding by the control group decreased. This dissipation was stimulus specific and not attributable to a response ceiling. Experiment 2 extended the generality of the effect to a sensory preconditioning design and further demonstrated that overshadowing lost through many compound-US pairings was restored by posttraining extinction of the training context. The results are explicable in terms of the extended comparator hypothesis (Denniston, Savastano, & Miller, 2001) under the assumption that the impacts of first- and second-order comparator processes grow differentially as a function of number of trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 18450071     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  17 in total

1.  Overshadowing and blocking as acquisition deficits: no recovery after extinction of overshadowing or blocking cues.

Authors:  P C Holland
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1999-11

Review 2.  A componential view of configural cues in generalization and discrimination in Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  S E Brandon; E H Vogel; A R Wagner
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Recovery from one-trial overshadowing.

Authors:  R P Cole; P Oberling; R R Miller
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

4.  Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.

Authors:  Steven C Stout; Raymond Chang; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

5.  Responding to a conditioned stimulus depends on the current associative status of other cues present during training of that specific stimulus.

Authors:  R R Miller; R C Barnet; N J Grahame
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1992-07

6.  A mathematical model for simple learning.

Authors:  R R BUSH; F MOSTELLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1951-09       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: support for the comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  A P Blaisdell; A S Bristol; L M Gunther; R R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1998-07

8.  Blocked and overshadowed stimuli are weakened in their ability to serve as blockers and second-order reinforcers in Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Authors:  A S Rauhut; J E McPhee; J J Ayres
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1999-01

9.  Potentiation rather than overshadowing in flavor-aversion learning: an analysis in terms of within-compound associations.

Authors:  P J Durlach; R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1980-04

10.  Overshadowing and summation in compound stimulus conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response.

Authors:  E J Kehoe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1982-10
View more
  13 in total

1.  The dual role of the context in postpeak performance decrements resulting from extended training.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  When more is less: extending training of the blocking association following compound training attenuates the blocking effect.

Authors:  Oskar Pineño; Kouji Urushihara; Steven Stout; Jessica Fuss; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Recency-to-primacy shift in cue competition.

Authors:  Olga Lipatova; Daniel S Wheeler; Miguel A Vadillo; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-10

Review 4.  Determinants of cue interactions.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  A response rule for positive and negative stimulus interaction in associative learning and performance.

Authors:  Oskar Pineño
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

6.  Performance factors in associative learning: assessment of the sometimes competing retrieval model.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Brittany M Wojick; Cody W Polack; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 7.  Methods of comparing associative models and an application to retrospective revaluation.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ryan Hutchings; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Nicotine competes with a visual stimulus for control of conditioned responding.

Authors:  Jennifer E Murray; Nicole R Wells; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.280

9.  Contrasting the overexpectation and extinction effects.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 10.  The error in total error reduction.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.