Literature DB >> 17044742

Recency-to-primacy shift in cue competition.

Olga Lipatova1, Daniel S Wheeler, Miguel A Vadillo, Ralph R Miller.   

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted using a lick-suppression preparation with rats to determine whether temporal and physical context shifts modulate the effectiveness of 2 sequentially trained blocking stimuli. Experiment 1 ascertained that it is possible to obtain blocking by conditioning rats to react to a target cue using 2 different blocking cues, each trained with a single-phase blocking paradigm. Experiment 2 showed that the more recently trained blocking stimulus was more effective (i.e., showed a recency effect) when testing was conducted immediately after training, but a long retention interval attenuated blocking by the most recently trained blocking stimulus and increased blocking by the initially trained blocking stimulus (i.e., a recency-to-primacy shift). This shift from recency to primacy affected in Experiment 2 by varying the retention interval was replicated in Experiment 3 by changing the physical context between training and testing. Taken together, the results indicate that the effectiveness of sequentially trained competing stimuli follows the same recency-to-primacy shift rule that is seen in traditional interference phenomena. Copyright 2006 APA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17044742      PMCID: PMC1796740          DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.4.396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  17 in total

1.  Associative interference between cues and between outcomes presented together and presented apart: an integration.

Authors:  Ralph R. Miller; Martha Escobar
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2002-04-28       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.

Authors:  Steven C Stout; Raymond Chang; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

3.  The basic laws of conditioning differ for elemental cues and cues trained in compound.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-04

4.  Retrospective revaluation effects in the conditioned suppression procedure.

Authors:  Ian Shevill; Geoffrey Hall
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2004-10

5.  Bidirectional associations in humans and rats.

Authors:  Francisco Arcediano; Martha Escobar; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-07

6.  Counteraction between overshadowing and degraded contingency treatments: support for the extended comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-01

7.  Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: support for the comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  A P Blaisdell; A S Bristol; L M Gunther; R R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1998-07

8.  Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people.

Authors:  A A Wright; H C Santiago; S F Sands; D F Kendrick; R G Cook
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  M E Bouton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  The Rescorla-Wagner model: losses in associative strength in compound conditioned stimuli.

Authors:  E F Kremer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1978-01
View more
  7 in total

1.  Sensory-specific associations in flavor-preference reversal learning.

Authors:  Janina Scarlet; Vincent Campese; Andrew R Delamater
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 2.  Issues in the extinction of specific stimulus-outcome associations in Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Andrew R Delamater
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Another look at the extinction of conditioned flavor preferences: Amount of training and tests for spontaneous recovery.

Authors:  Andrew R Delamater; Norman Tu; Jasmine Huang
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Negative feedback: ants choose unoccupied over occupied food sources and lay more pheromone to them.

Authors:  Stephanie Wendt; Nico Kleinhoelting; Tomer J Czaczkes
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Retrospective revaluation of associative retroactive cue interference.

Authors:  Gonzalo Miguez; Mario A Laborda; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Overshadowing and CS duration: counteraction and a reexamination of the role of within-compound associations in cue competition.

Authors:  Heather T Sissons; Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Place and Response Learning in the Open-field Tower Maze.

Authors:  Olga Lipatova; Matthew M Campolattaro; Donna J Toufexis; Erin A Mabry
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 1.355

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.