Literature DB >> 18229484

A response rule for positive and negative stimulus interaction in associative learning and performance.

Oskar Pineño1.   

Abstract

The present article presents a response rule developed to account for both positive and negative stimulus interaction. In the response rule proposed here, positive interaction phenomena (e.g., second-order conditioning) and negative interaction phenomena (e.g., Pavlovian conditioned inhibition) are presumed to occur during performance and acquisition, respectively. Also, in this rule the novelty of the test stimulus determines the expression of positive interaction on responding. As the stimulus loses its novelty over training, positive interaction effects will wane, which will allow negative interaction effects to emerge in responding elicited by the stimulus. It is proposed that this response rule can be adopted by acquisition-focused associative models (e.g., Rescorla & Wagner, 1972) in order to account for contrary associative phenomena in the literature. The simulation program used in this study is available for download from the author's website and from the Psychonomic Society website at www.psychonomic.org/archive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18229484     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  24 in total

1.  Retrospective revaluation or mediated conditioning? The effect of different reinforcers.

Authors:  D M Dwyer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1999-11

2.  Augmentation, not blocking, in an A+/AX+ flavor-conditioning procedure.

Authors:  J D Batson; W R Batsell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

Review 3.  Using pavlovian higher-order conditioning paradigms to investigate the neural substrates of emotional learning and memory.

Authors:  J C Gewirtz; M Davis
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 4.  Forgetting of stimulus attributes: methodological implications for assessing associative phenomena.

Authors:  D C Riccio; J Ackil; A Burch-Vernon
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Latent inhibition: the effect of nonreinforced pre-exposure to the conditional stimulus.

Authors:  R E LUBOW; A U MOORE
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-08

6.  Sometimes-competing retrieval (SOCR): a formalization of the comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Potentiation instead of overshadowing in the pigeon.

Authors:  J C Clarke; R F Westbrook; J Irwin
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1979-01

8.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Memory retrieval deficits based upon altered contextual cues: a paradox.

Authors:  D C Riccio; R Richardson; D L Ebner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Mediated conditioning and retrospective revaluation with LiCl then flavour pairings.

Authors:  D M Dwyer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2001-05
View more
  6 in total

1.  The criterion-calibration model of cue interaction in contingency judgments.

Authors:  Samuel D Hannah; Lorraine G Allan
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Some determinants of second-order conditioning.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Extinction with multiple excitors.

Authors:  Bridget L McConnell; Gonzalo Miguez; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 4.  Methods of comparing associative models and an application to retrospective revaluation.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ryan Hutchings; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 5.  The error in total error reduction.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.877

6.  Second-Order Conditioning and Conditioned Inhibition in Different Moments of the Same Training: The Effect of A+ and AX- Trial Number.

Authors:  Clara Muñiz-Diez; Judit Muñiz-Moreno; Ignacio Loy
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.558

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.