Literature DB >> 19429226

Contrasting the overexpectation and extinction effects.

James E Witnauer1, Ralph R Miller.   

Abstract

After many target stimulus (X)-unconditioned stimulus (US) pairings, further conditioning of X in the presence of another well-established signal for the US (A) disrupts X's behavioral control. Some researchers have argued that the mechanism underlying this so-called overexpectation effect is similar to that underlying extinction (a reduction in X's behavioral control due to X-alone presentations). Three conditioned suppression experiments with rats as subjects compared overexpectation and extinction. Experiment 1 replicated the basic overexpectation effect by showing that A disrupts responding to X more than does a previously neutral stimulus. Experiment 2 found that posttraining context exposure disrupts extinction but not overexpectation. Experiment 3 suggested that overexpectation and extinction are differentially sensitive to the effects of overtraining (compound reinforced or nonreinforced, respectively), such that extinction is enhanced by increases in the amount of nonreinforced trials and overexpectation is unaffected. These results are inconsistent with the view that overexpectation and extinction are driven by a common mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19429226      PMCID: PMC2680743          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  8 in total

1.  Is stimulus competition an acquisition deficit or a performance deficit?

Authors:  Francisco Arcediano; Martha Escobar; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

2.  Spontaneous recovery from overexpectation.

Authors:  Robert A Rescorla
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Renewal after overexpectation.

Authors:  Robert A Rescorla
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Sometimes-competing retrieval (SOCR): a formalization of the comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Overshadowing as a function of trial number: dynamics of first- and second-order comparator effects.

Authors:  Steven Stout; Francisco Arcediano; Martha Escobar; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Spacing extinction trials alleviates renewal and spontaneous recovery.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Overexpectation and trial massing.

Authors:  Heather T Sissons; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-04

8.  Overshadowing and CS duration: counteraction and a reexamination of the role of within-compound associations in cue competition.

Authors:  Heather T Sissons; Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.986

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Contrasting AAC and ABC renewal: the role of context associations.

Authors:  Mario A Laborda; James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Over-expectation generated in a complex appetitive goal-tracking task is capable of inducing memory reconsolidation.

Authors:  Amy C Reichelt; Jonathan L C Lee
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  The role of within-compound associations in learning about absent cues.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  On the differences in degree of renewal produced by the different renewal designs.

Authors:  Cody W Polack; Mario A Laborda; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Neural correlates of two different types of extinction learning in the amygdala central nucleus.

Authors:  Mihaela D Iordanova; Mickael L D Deroche; Guillem R Esber; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.