Literature DB >> 18355987

Determinants of cue interactions.

Daniel S Wheeler1, Ralph R Miller.   

Abstract

In a Pavlovian conditioning situation, there are many training variables that may affect responding to a conditioned stimulus (CS), such as contiguity, contingency, and the presence of other CSs. This review describes recent experiments that show that some manipulations that usually decrease responding to a CS may have the opposite effect when they are combined with other normally pernicious manipulations. A theoretical framework that explains these so-called counteraction effects is provided. The apparent boundary conditions on the effects and limitations of the theory are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18355987      PMCID: PMC2528875          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  42 in total

1.  Summation of overshadowing and latent inhibition in rats' conditioned taste aversion: scapegoat technique works for familiar meals.

Authors:  S Nakajima; H Ka; J Imada
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Latent inhibition and contextual associations.

Authors:  Martha Escobar; Francisco Arcediano; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2002-04

Review 3.  Associative deficit accounts of disrupted latent inhibition and blocking in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Martha Escobar; Philippe Oberling; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.

Authors:  Steven C Stout; Raymond Chang; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

5.  The basic laws of conditioning differ for elemental cues and cues trained in compound.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-04

6.  Some determinants of second-order conditioning.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-08

8.  Quantification of response suppression in conditioned anxiety training.

Authors:  J R Millenson; D P Hendry
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1967-06

9.  Taste aversion after ingestion of lithium chloride: an associative analysis.

Authors:  Ignacio Loy; Geoffrey Hall
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2002-10

10.  The US-preexposure effect in lithium-induced flavor-aversion conditioning is a consequence of blocking by injection cues.

Authors:  Isabel de Brugada; Geoffrey Hall; Michelle Symonds
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-01
View more
  14 in total

1.  Reduced blocking as a result of increasing the number of blocking cues.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

2.  Some determinants of second-order conditioning.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Extinction with multiple excitors.

Authors:  Bridget L McConnell; Gonzalo Miguez; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 4.  Methods of comparing associative models and an application to retrospective revaluation.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ryan Hutchings; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Contrasting predictions of extended comparator hypothesis and acquisition-focused models of learning concerning retrospective revaluation.

Authors:  Bridget L McConnell; Kouji Urushihara; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-01

6.  The role of within-compound associations in learning about absent cues.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Superadditive effects of ethanol and flunitrazepam: implications of using immunopharmacotherapy as a therapeutic.

Authors:  Jennifer B Treweek; Amanda J Roberts; Kim D Janda
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Conditioned suppression is an inverted-U function of footshock intensity.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 9.  The error in total error reduction.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Overexpectation and trial massing.

Authors:  Heather T Sissons; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.