Literature DB >> 16786881

When more is less: extending training of the blocking association following compound training attenuates the blocking effect.

Oskar Pineño1, Kouji Urushihara, Steven Stout, Jessica Fuss, Ralph R Miller.   

Abstract

Three conditioned lick suppression experiments with rats were performed to assess the influence, following compound training of two stimuli (A and X) with the same outcome (AX-O trials), of extending training of the blocking association (i.e., A-O) on responding to the target stimulus (X) at test. In Experiment 1, backward blocking was attenuated when the blocking association was extensively trained. Experiment 2 showed that forward blocking was also attenuated by extensive further training of the blocking association following the AX-O trials. Experiment 3 contrasted candidate explanations of the results of Experiments 1 and 2 and demonstrated that these results are consistent with the framework of the extended comparator hypothesis (Denniston, Savastano, & Miller, 2001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16786881      PMCID: PMC1809472          DOI: 10.3758/bf03192868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  10 in total

1.  Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: a challenge for comparator theory.

Authors:  Klaus G Melchers; Harald Lachnit; David R Shanks
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2004-01

2.  Temporal integration and temporal backward associations in human and nonhuman subjects.

Authors:  Francisco Arcediano; Martha Escobar; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.

Authors:  Steven C Stout; Raymond Chang; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

4.  Bidirectional associations in humans and rats.

Authors:  Francisco Arcediano; Martha Escobar; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-07

5.  Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgment.

Authors:  G B Chapman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Overshadowing as a function of trial number: dynamics of first- and second-order comparator effects.

Authors:  Steven Stout; Francisco Arcediano; Martha Escobar; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Backward blocking and recovery from overshadowing in human causal judgement: the role of within-compound associations.

Authors:  E A Wasserman; L R Berglan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1998-05

8.  Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements.

Authors:  A Dickinson; J Burke
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1996-02

9.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  J M Pearce; G Hall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment.

Authors:  R R Miller; H Matute
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-12
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Reasoning rats: forward blocking in Pavlovian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference.

Authors:  Tom Beckers; Ralph R Miller; Jan De Houwer; Kouji Urushihara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-02

2.  Backward blocking in first-order conditioning.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.