Literature DB >> 18392817

Age-specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children's hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method.

Karen E Thomas1, Bo Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a need for an easily accessible method for effective dose estimation in pediatric CT.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate effective doses for a variety of pediatric neurological and body CT examinations in five age groups using recently published age- and region-specific dose length product (DLP) to effective dose conversion coefficients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 1,431 consecutive CT scans over a 12-week period using age- and weight-adjusted CT protocols. Age- and region-specific DLP to effective dose conversion coefficients were applied to console-displayed DLP data.
RESULTS: Effective dose estimates for single-phase head CT scans in neonatal, and 1-, 5-, 10- and 15-year-old age groups were 4.2, 3.6, 2.4, 2.0 and 1.4 mSv, respectively. For abdomen/pelvis CT scans the corresponding effective doses were 13.1, 11.1, 8.4, 8.9 and 5.9 mSv. The range of pediatric CT effective doses is wide, from ultralow dose protocols (<1 mSv) to extended-coverage body examinations (10-15 mSv).
CONCLUSION: Age- and region-specific pediatric DLP to effective dose conversion coefficients provide an accessible and user-friendly method for estimating pediatric CT effective doses that is available to radiologists working without medical physics support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18392817     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-008-0794-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  22 in total

1.  FDA public health notification: reducing radiation risk from computed tomography for pediatric and small adult patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-04-05

2.  Current adult and pediatric CT doses.

Authors:  Edward Nickoloff
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-07

3.  Effective dose in paediatric computed tomography.

Authors:  C L Chapple; S Willis; J Frame
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003.

Authors:  P C Shrimpton; M C Hillier; M A Lewis; M Dunn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Awais Vance
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Estimation of effective doses to adult and pediatric patients from multislice computed tomography: A method based on energy imparted.

Authors:  Nicholas Theocharopoulos; John Damilakis; Kostas Perisinakis; Antonis Tzedakis; Apostolos Karantanas; Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients.

Authors:  W Huda; J V Atherton; D E Ware; W A Cumming
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Survey of effective dose levels from typical paediatric CT protocols.

Authors:  Donald McLean; Nathan Malitz; Sarah Lewis
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  2003-06

9.  Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja Meyer; Martin Hadamitzky; Ester Huber; Maria Zankl; Stefan Martinoff; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  CT doses in children: a multicentre study.

Authors:  J Pages; N Buls; M Osteaux
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  67 in total

1.  A pediatric CT dose and risk estimator.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Grace S Phillips
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-07-11

2.  Volume-monitored chest CT: a simplified method for obtaining motion-free images near full inspiratory and end expiratory lung volumes.

Authors:  Kathryn S Mueller; Frederick R Long; Robert L Flucke; Robert G Castile
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-05-28

3.  Nationwide survey of radiation exposure during pediatric computed tomography examinations and proposal of age-based diagnostic reference levels for Japan.

Authors:  Yasutaka Takei; Osamu Miyazaki; Kosuke Matsubara; Yoshiya Shimada; Yoshihisa Muramatsu; Keiichi Akahane; Keisuke Fujii; Shoichi Suzuki; Kichiro Koshida
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-02

4.  Radiation Dose Reduction by Indication-Directed Focused z-Direction Coverage for Neck CT.

Authors:  A K Parikh; C C Shah
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Assessments of Coronary Artery Visibility and Radiation Dose in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease on Cardiac 128-slice CT and on Cardiac 64-slice CT.

Authors:  Y Cui; M Huang; J Zheng; J Li; H Liu; C Liang
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 6.  Paediatric cardiac computed tomography: a review of imaging techniques and radiation dose consideration.

Authors:  Carolyn Young; Andrew M Taylor; Catherine M Owens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Dynamic pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a new standard for evaluation of combined airway and vascular abnormalities in infants.

Authors:  S Bruce Greenberg; Umesh Dyamenahalli
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Patient-specific dose estimation for pediatric chest CT.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ehsan Samei; W Paul Segars; Gregory M Sturgeon; James G Colsher; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Small field of view cone beam CT temporomandibular joint imaging dosimetry.

Authors:  T D Lukat; J C M Wong; E W N Lam
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Assessment of paediatric CT dose indicators for the purpose of optimisation.

Authors:  Z Brady; F Ramanauskas; T M Cain; P N Johnston
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.