Literature DB >> 12780441

Survey of effective dose levels from typical paediatric CT protocols.

Donald McLean1, Nathan Malitz, Sarah Lewis.   

Abstract

Concern over reported large radiation doses leading to a high cancer risk for paediatric CT patients has prompted considerable investigation in paediatric CT. The recent release of software from Germany has allowed effective doses to be calculated from CT protocol information and radiation measurement for standard paediatric patient sizes for both sexes. An initial study has been undertaken in nine radiology departments, four of which were dedicated paediatric departments, for routine chest and abdominal CT procedures. The dose calculation software is based on Monte Carlo simulation of X-ray conditions during a CT procedure and utilized a 'tomographic' phantom model of a 7-year-old child and an 8-week-old baby to allow calculation of organ dose and hence effective dose. Results of the survey indicate that effective doses were higher for females than males, and higher for abdominal procedures. Slightly higher effective doses were calculated for the child compared to the baby. All centres but one recorded lower effective doses with their current protocols than if they had used recommended CT protocols found in the literature. Analysis of the survey data indicates that scan parameters are the main cause of dose variations, although the type of scanner can affect dose by a factor of 2 (when comparing different units) as well as variation in anatomy scanned in protocols. Dose reduction appears to be most closely linked with reduced mAs and increased pitch as expected. The calculation of effective dose appears to be a key factor in assessing CT protocols, particularly for paediatric patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12780441     DOI: 10.1046/j.0004-8461.2003.01141.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Radiol        ISSN: 0004-8461


  11 in total

Review 1.  Exposing the thyroid to radiation: a review of its current extent, risks, and implications.

Authors:  Bridget Sinnott; Elaine Ron; Arthur B Schneider
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Age-specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children's hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method.

Authors:  Karen E Thomas; Bo Wang
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-04-08

3.  Radiation doses to children during modified barium swallow studies.

Authors:  Kelly A Weir; Sandra M McMahon; Gillian Long; Judith A Bunch; Nirmala Pandeya; Kerry S Coakley; Anne B Chang
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-01-10

4.  Radiation Safety in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jun-Yong Hong; Na-Kyoung Hwang; Gihyoun Lee; Ji-Su Park; Young-Jin Jung
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  CT in children with abdominal cancer: should we routinely include the pelvis?

Authors:  Sakthivel Gnanasambandam; Øystein Erlend Olsen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2005-12-06

6.  Assessment of paediatric CT dose indicators for the purpose of optimisation.

Authors:  Z Brady; F Ramanauskas; T M Cain; P N Johnston
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Predicted cancer risks induced by computed tomography examinations during childhood, by a quantitative risk assessment approach.

Authors:  Neige Journy; Sophie Ancelet; Jean-Luc Rehel; Myriam Mezzarobba; Bernard Aubert; Dominique Laurier; Marie-Odile Bernier
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Radiation dose evaluation in head and neck MDCT examinations with a 6-year-old child anthropomorphic phantom.

Authors:  Chiyo Yamauchi-Kawaura; Keisuke Fujii; Takahiko Aoyama; Shuji Koyama; Masato Yamauchi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-01-12

9.  Multislice CT of the head and body routine scans: Are scanning protocols adjusted for paediatric patients?

Authors:  Z Sun; Ks Al Ghamdi; Ih Baroum
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2012-01-01

10.  Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians.

Authors:  John D Mathews; Anna V Forsythe; Zoe Brady; Martin W Butler; Stacy K Goergen; Graham B Byrnes; Graham G Giles; Anthony B Wallace; Philip R Anderson; Tenniel A Guiver; Paul McGale; Timothy M Cain; James G Dowty; Adrian C Bickerstaffe; Sarah C Darby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.