Literature DB >> 18367789

Monte Carlo calculations and measurements of absorbed dose per monitor unit for the treatment of uveal melanoma with proton therapy.

Nicholas Koch1, Wayne D Newhauser, Uwe Titt, Dan Gombos, Kevin Coombes, George Starkschall.   

Abstract

The treatment of uveal melanoma with proton radiotherapy has provided excellent clinical outcomes. However, contemporary treatment planning systems use simplistic dose algorithms that limit the accuracy of relative dose distributions. Further, absolute predictions of absorbed dose per monitor unit are not yet available in these systems. The purpose of this study was to determine if Monte Carlo methods could predict dose per monitor unit (D/MU) value at the center of a proton spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) to within 1% on measured values for a variety of treatment fields relevant to ocular proton therapy. The MCNPX Monte Carlo transport code, in combination with realistic models for the ocular beam delivery apparatus and a water phantom, was used to calculate dose distributions and D/MU values, which were verified by the measurements. Measured proton beam data included central-axis depth dose profiles, relative cross-field profiles and absolute D/MU measurements under several combinations of beam penetration ranges and range-modulation widths. The Monte Carlo method predicted D/MU values that agreed with measurement to within 1% and dose profiles that agreed with measurement to within 3% of peak dose or within 0.5 mm distance-to-agreement. Lastly, a demonstration of the clinical utility of this technique included calculations of dose distributions and D/MU values in a realistic model of the human eye. It is possible to predict D/MU values accurately for clinical relevant range-modulated proton beams for ocular therapy using the Monte Carlo method. It is thus feasible to use the Monte Carlo method as a routine absolute dose algorithm for ocular proton therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18367789      PMCID: PMC4101899          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/6/005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  27 in total

Review 1.  Uveal melanoma: proton beam irradiation.

Authors:  Evangelos S Gragoudas; Anne Marie Lane
Journal:  Ophthalmol Clin North Am       Date:  2005-03

2.  Monte Carlo simulations of a nozzle for the treatment of ocular tumours with high-energy proton beams.

Authors:  Wayne Newhauser; Nicholas Koch; Stephen Hummel; Matthias Ziegler; Uwe Titt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Uveal melanomas near the optic disc or fovea. Visual results after proton beam irradiation.

Authors:  J M Seddon; E S Gragoudas; K M Egan; R J Glynn; J E Munzenrider; M Austin-Seymour; M Goitein; L Verhey; M Urie; A Koehler
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Proton beam irradiation. An alternative to enucleation for intraocular melanomas.

Authors:  E S Gragoudas; M Goitein; L Verhey; J Munzenreider; H D Suit; A Koehler
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Planning proton therapy of the eye.

Authors:  M Goitein; T Miller
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Proton irradiation of choroidal melanomas. Preliminary results.

Authors:  E S Gradoudas; M Goitein; A Koehler; I J Constable; M S Wagner; L Verhey; J Tepper; H D Suit; R J Brockhurst; R J Schneider; K N Johnson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-09

7.  Visual outcome after proton beam irradiation of uveal melanoma.

Authors:  J M Seddon; E S Gragoudas; L Polivogianis; C C Hsieh; K M Egan; M Goitein; L Verhey; J Munzenrider; M Austin-Seymour; M Urie
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Conservative treatment of uveal melanoma: probability of eye retention after proton treatment.

Authors:  J E Munzenrider; E S Gragoudas; J M Seddon; J Sisterson; P McNulty; S Birnbaum; K Johnson; M Austin-Seymour; J Slater; M M Goitein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Monte Carlo simulation of a protontherapy platform devoted to ocular melanoma.

Authors:  J Hérault; N Iborra; B Serrano; P Chauvel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Conservative treatment of uveal melanoma: local recurrence after proton beam therapy.

Authors:  J E Munzenrider; L J Verhey; E S Gragoudas; J M Seddon; M Urie; R Gentry; S Birnbaum; D M Ruotolo; C Crowell; P McManus
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  20 in total

1.  Assessment of targeting accuracy of a low-energy stereotactic radiosurgery treatment for age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Erik Chell; Steven Hansen; Michael Gertner; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A GPU implementation of a track-repeating algorithm for proton radiotherapy dose calculations.

Authors:  Pablo P Yepes; Dragan Mirkovic; Phillip J Taddei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Monte Carlo and analytical model predictions of leakage neutron exposures from passively scattered proton therapy.

Authors:  Angélica Pérez-Andújar; Rui Zhang; Wayne Newhauser
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Benchmark measurements and simulations of dose perturbations due to metallic spheres in proton beams.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Laura Rechner; Dragan Mirkovic; Pablo Yepes; Nicholas C Koch; Uwe Titt; Jonas D Fontenot; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.898

5.  Effective Dose from Stray Radiation for a Patient Receiving Proton Therapy for Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Sunil Krishnan; Dragan Mirkovic; Pablo Yepes; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2009-03-10

6.  ADVANTAGES OF MCNPX-BASED LATTICE TALLY OVER MESH TALLY IN HIGH-SPEED MONTE CARLO DOSE RECONSTRUCTION FOR PROTON RADIOTHERAPY.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Jonas D Fontenot; Dragan Mirkovic; John S Hendricks; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Nucl Technol       Date:  2013-07

7.  Maximum proton kinetic energy and patient-generated neutron fluence considerations in proton beam arc delivery radiation therapy.

Authors:  E Sengbusch; A Pérez-Andújar; P M DeLuca; T R Mackie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Neutron production from beam-modifying devices in a modern double scattering proton therapy beam delivery system.

Authors:  Angélica Pérez-Andújar; Wayne D Newhauser; Paul M Deluca
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Assessment of the accuracy of an MCNPX-based Monte Carlo simulation model for predicting three-dimensional absorbed dose distributions.

Authors:  U Titt; N Sahoo; X Ding; Y Zheng; W D Newhauser; X R Zhu; J C Polf; M T Gillin; R Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Development and verification of an analytical algorithm to predict absorbed dose distributions in ocular proton therapy using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Nicholas C Koch; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.