Literature DB >> 15895573

Monte Carlo simulation of a protontherapy platform devoted to ocular melanoma.

J Hérault1, N Iborra, B Serrano, P Chauvel.   

Abstract

Patients with ocular melanoma have been treated since June 1991 at the medical cyclotron of the Centre Antoine Lacassagne (CAL). Positions and sizes of the ocular nozzle elements were initially defined based on experimental work, taking as a pattern functional existing facilities. Nowadays Monte Carlo (MC) calculation offers a tool to refine this geometry by adjusting size and place of beam modeling devices. Moreover, the MC tool is a useful way to calculate the dose and to evaluate the impact of secondary particles in the field of radiotherapy or radiation protection. Both LINAC and cyclotron producing x rays, electrons, protons, and neutrons are available in CAL, which suggests choosing MCNPX for its particle versatility. As a first step, the existing installation was input in MCNPX to check its aptitude to reproduce experimentally measured depth-dose profile, lateral profile, output-factor (OF), and absolute dose. The geometry was defined precisely and described from the last achromatic bending magnet of our proton beam line to the position of treated eyes. Relative comparisons of percentage depth-dose and lateral profiles, performed between measured data and simulations, show an agreement of the order of 2% in dose and 0.1 mm in range accuracy. These comparisons, carried out with and without beam-modifying device, yield results compatible to the required precision in ocular melanoma treatments, as long as adequate choices are made on MCNPX input decks for physics card. Absolute dose and OF issued from calculations and measurements were also compared. Results obtained for these two kinds of data, carried out in the simplified situation of an unmodulated beam, indicate that MC calculation could effectively complement measurements. These encouraging results are a large source of motivation to promote further studies, first in a new design of the ocular nozzle, and second in the analysis of the influence of beam-modifying devices attached to the final patient collimator, such as wedge or compensators, on dose values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15895573     DOI: 10.1118/1.1871392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  26 in total

1.  An MCNPX Monte Carlo model of a discrete spot scanning proton beam therapy nozzle.

Authors:  Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Dragan Mirkovic; Luis A Perles; Narayan Sahoo; X Ron Zhu; George Ciangaru; Kazumichi Suzuki; Michael T Gillin; Radhe Mohan; Uwe Titt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Assessment of targeting accuracy of a low-energy stereotactic radiosurgery treatment for age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Erik Chell; Steven Hansen; Michael Gertner; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Contribution to Neutron Fluence and Neutron Absorbed Dose from Double Scattering Proton Therapy System Components.

Authors:  A Pérez-Andújar; W D Newhauser; P M Deluca
Journal:  Nucl Technol       Date:  2009-01-01

4.  Monte Carlo and analytical model predictions of leakage neutron exposures from passively scattered proton therapy.

Authors:  Angélica Pérez-Andújar; Rui Zhang; Wayne Newhauser
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Monte Carlo calculations and measurements of absorbed dose per monitor unit for the treatment of uveal melanoma with proton therapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Koch; Wayne D Newhauser; Uwe Titt; Dan Gombos; Kevin Coombes; George Starkschall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Experimental depth dose curves of a 67.5 MeV proton beam for benchmarking and validation of Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Bruce A Faddegon; Jungwook Shin; Carlos M Castenada; José Ramos-Méndez; Inder K Daftari
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications.

Authors:  J Perl; J Shin; J Schumann; B Faddegon; H Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Maximum proton kinetic energy and patient-generated neutron fluence considerations in proton beam arc delivery radiation therapy.

Authors:  E Sengbusch; A Pérez-Andújar; P M DeLuca; T R Mackie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Neutron production from beam-modifying devices in a modern double scattering proton therapy beam delivery system.

Authors:  Angélica Pérez-Andújar; Wayne D Newhauser; Paul M Deluca
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Monte Carlo simulation of the neutron spectral fluence and dose equivalent for use in shielding a proton therapy vault.

Authors:  Yuanshui Zheng; Wayne Newhauser; Eric Klein; Daniel Low
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.