Literature DB >> 18345840

Inverted direction of wave propagation (IDWP) in the cochlea.

Egbert de Boer1, Jiefu Zheng, Edward Porsov, Alfred L Nuttall.   

Abstract

The "classical" view on wave propagation is that propagating waves are possible in both directions along the length of the basilar membrane and that they have identical properties. Results of several recently executed experiments [T. Ren, Nat. Neurosci. 2, 333-334 (2004) and W. X. He, A. L. Nuttall, and T. Ren, Hear. Res., 228, 112-122 (2007)] appear to contradict this view. In the current work measurements were made of the velocity of the guinea-pig basilar membrane (BM). Distortion products (DPs) were produced by presenting two primary tones, with frequencies below the characteristic frequency f(0) of the BM location at which the BM measurements were made, with a constant frequency ratio. In each experiment the phase of the principal DP, with frequency 2f(1)-f(2), was recorded as a function of the DP frequency. The results indicate that the DP wave going from the two-tone interaction region toward the stapes is not everywhere traveling in the reverse direction, but also in the forward direction. The extent of the region in which the forward wave occurs appears larger than is accounted for by classical theory. This property has been termed "inverted direction of wave propagation." The results of this study confirm the wave propagation findings of other authors. The experimental data are compared to theoretical predictions for a classical three-dimensional model of the cochlea that is based on noise-response data of the same animal. Possible physical mechanisms underlying the findings are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18345840      PMCID: PMC3647475          DOI: 10.1121/1.2828064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. III. Intensity effects.

Authors:  E de Boer; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Distortion-product source unmixing: a test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation.

Authors:  R Kalluri; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spontaneous basilar membrane oscillation and otoacoustic emission at 15 kHz in a guinea pig.

Authors:  A L Nuttall; K Grosh; J Zheng; E de Boer; Y Zou; T Ren
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

4.  Spontaneous basilar-membrane oscillation (SBMO) and coherent reflection.

Authors:  Egbert de Boer; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-21

5.  Comparison of group delays of 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear travel times.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  Acoust Res Lett Online       Date:  2004-10

6.  Laser Doppler velocimetry of basilar membrane vibration.

Authors:  A L Nuttall; D F Dolan; G Avinash
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Classical and non-classical models of the cochlea.

Authors:  E de Boer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A cochlear model using feed-forward outer-hair-cell forces.

Authors:  C D Geisler; C Sang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  14 in total

1.  Direction of wave propagation in the cochlea for internally excited basilar membrane.

Authors:  Yizeng Li; Karl Grosh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Fast reverse propagation of sound in the living cochlea.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; Anders Fridberger; Edward Porsov; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Inverse-solution method for a class of non-classical cochlear models.

Authors:  Egbert de Boer; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Local cochlear damage reduces local nonlinearity and decreases generator-type cochlear emissions while increasing reflector-type emissions.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Forward- and Reverse-Traveling Waves in DP Phenomenology: Does Inverted Direction of Wave Propagation Occur in Classical Models?

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Christopher A Shera; Arturo Moleti; Teresa Botti
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2011

6.  Time-domain demonstration of distributed distortion-product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Distortion products and backward-traveling waves in nonlinear active models of the cochlea.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Teresa Botti; Daniele Bertaccini; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Simultaneous Intracochlear Pressure Measurements from Two Cochlear Locations: Propagation of Distortion Products in Gerbil.

Authors:  Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-01

9.  Basilar-membrane interference patterns from multiple internal reflection of cochlear traveling waves.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Nigel P Cooper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Forward and Reverse Waves: Modeling Distortion Products in the Intracochlear Fluid Pressure.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.