Literature DB >> 6316713

Intracochlear electrical stimulation of normal and deaf cats investigated using brainstem response audiometry.

R C Black, G M Clark, S J O'Leary, C Walters.   

Abstract

Brainstem response audiometry for intracochlear electrical stimulation of normal-hearing and deafened cats was investigated. In normal cochleas the brainstem response amplitude grew slowly near threshold as a current-amplitude dependent process, identified as electrophonic in origin. This terminated in a rapidly growing charge-dependent process at approximately 20 dB above threshold, identified as direct electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. Small levels of white noise (25-35 dB SPL) were sufficient to mask most of the electrophonic response, leaving the direct stimulation process essentially unmodified. In cochleas damaged with d.c. currents and loud sounds, only a rapidly growing charge-dependent process was observed which grew similarly to that in normal-hearing cats but occurred at lower currents. This indicates that possibly the electrical properties of the cochlea were altered in the deafening process, suggesting the inadequacy of normal animals as deaf models for electrical stimulation. Using the technique of derived brainstem responses, it was shown that direct electrical stimulus components were localized to the vicinity of the stimulus electrode with electrophonic components distributed more widely. However, at high currents there was some evidence of the stimulus spreading into the internal auditory meatus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6316713     DOI: 10.3109/00016488309105588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl        ISSN: 0365-5237


  14 in total

1.  Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; David J Sly; James B Fallon; Mark W White; Robert K Shepherd; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons?

Authors:  Anne Coco; Stephanie B Epp; James B Fallon; Jin Xu; Rodney E Millard; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Electromotile hearing: acoustic tones mask psychophysical response to high-frequency electrical stimulation of intact guinea pig cochleae.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Kohei Kawamoto; Yehoash Raphael; David F Dolan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Stapedius reflexes to electrical stimulation in the rabbit for the assessment of hearing.

Authors:  C Pieren; R Probst
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Chronic neurotrophin delivery promotes ectopic neurite growth from the spiral ganglion of deafened cochleae without compromising the spatial selectivity of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Thomas G Landry; James B Fallon; Andrew K Wise; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Effect of current focusing on the sensitivity of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated stimulation.

Authors:  Shefin S George; Mohit N Shivdasani; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Electrically evoked auditory nerve responses in the cochlea with normal outer hair cells.

Authors:  Tianying Ren; Menghe Guo; Wenxuan He; Josef M Miller; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2009-12-01

9.  Spread of cochlear excitation during stimulation with pulsed infrared radiation: inferior colliculus measurements.

Authors:  C-P Richter; S M Rajguru; A I Matic; E L Moreno; A J Fishman; A M Robinson; E Suh; J T Walsh
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Effects of neonatal partial deafness and chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation on auditory and electrical response characteristics in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Robert K Shepherd; Mel Brown; Dexter R F Irvine
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.