Literature DB >> 27194332

Neural Coding of Interaural Time Differences with Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Unanesthetized Rabbits.

Yoojin Chung1, Kenneth E Hancock2, Bertrand Delgutte2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Although bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) provide improvements in sound localization and speech perception in noise over unilateral CIs, bilateral CI users' sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) is still poorer than normal. In particular, ITD sensitivity of most CI users degrades with increasing stimulation rate and is lacking at the high carrier pulse rates used in CI processors to deliver speech information. To gain a better understanding of the neural basis for this degradation, we characterized ITD tuning of single neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC) for pulse train stimuli in an unanesthetized rabbit model of bilateral CIs. Approximately 73% of IC neurons showed significant ITD sensitivity in their overall firing rates. On average, ITD sensitivity was best for pulse rates near 80-160 pulses per second (pps) and degraded for both lower and higher pulse rates. The degradation in ITD sensitivity at low pulse rates was caused by strong, unsynchronized background activity that masked stimulus-driven responses in many neurons. Selecting synchronized responses by temporal windowing revealed ITD sensitivity in these neurons. With temporal windowing, both the fraction of ITD-sensitive neurons and the degree of ITD sensitivity decreased monotonically with increasing pulse rate. To compare neural ITD sensitivity to human performance in ITD discrimination, neural just-noticeable differences (JNDs) in ITD were computed using signal detection theory. Using temporal windowing at lower pulse rates, and overall firing rate at higher pulse rates, neural ITD JNDs were within the range of perceptual JNDs in human CI users over a wide range of pulse rates. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Many profoundly deaf people wearing cochlear implants (CIs) still face challenges in everyday situations, such as understanding conversations in noise. Even with CIs in both ears, they have difficulty making full use of subtle differences in the sounds reaching the two ears [interaural time difference (ITD)] to identify where the sound is coming from. This problem is especially acute at the high stimulation rates used in clinical CI processors. This study provides a better understanding of ITD processing with bilateral CIs and shows a parallel between human performance in ITD discrimination and neural responses in the auditory midbrain. The present study is the first report on binaural properties of auditory neurons with CIs in unanesthetized animals.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/365520-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binaural hearing; cochlear implant; inferior colliculus; interaural time difference; temporal coding

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27194332      PMCID: PMC4871987          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3795-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  45 in total

1.  Response of inferior colliculus neurons to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in neonatally deafened cats.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; J H Baxi; N A Hardie
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Electrical stimulation rate effects on speech perception in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Komal Arora; Pam Dawson; Richard Dowell; Andrew Vandali
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  R J van Hoesel; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Point-neuron model for binaural interaction in MSO.

Authors:  Y Han; H S Colburn
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Noise-induced hyperactivity in the inferior colliculus: its relationship with hyperactivity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  N F Manzoor; F G Licari; M Klapchar; R L Elkin; Y Gao; G Chen; J A Kaltenbach
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Profound hearing loss in the cat following the single co-administration of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid.

Authors:  S A Xu; R K Shepherd; Y Chen; G M Clark
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Interaural time difference discrimination thresholds for single neurons in the inferior colliculus of Guinea pigs.

Authors:  Trevor M Shackleton; Bernt C Skottun; Robert H Arnott; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Inferior colliculus unitary activity in wakefulness, sleep and under barbiturates.

Authors:  Pablo Torterolo; Atilio Falconi; Gabriela Morales-Cobas; Ricardo A Velluti
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2002-05-10       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Limitations on Monaural and Binaural Temporal Processing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Robert P Carlyon; Alan Kan; Tyler H Churchill; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-24
View more
  16 in total

1.  Neural ITD Sensitivity and Temporal Coding with Cochlear Implants in an Animal Model of Early-Onset Deafness.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Brian D Buechel; Woongsang Sunwoo; Joseph D Wagner; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-08

2.  Neural coding and perception of auditory motion direction based on interaural time differences.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Zuk; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Kyle Easter; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Chronic Bilateral Cochlear Implant Stimulation Partially Restores Neural Binaural Sensitivity in Neonatally-Deaf Rabbits.

Authors:  Woongsang Sunwoo; Bertrand Delgutte; Yoojin Chung
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Specific loss of neural sensitivity to interaural time difference of unmodulated noise stimuli following noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Hariprakash Haragopal; Ryan Dorkoski; Austin R Pollard; Gareth A Whaley; Timothy R Wohl; Noelle C Stroud; Mitchell L Day
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Simulated auditory fiber myelination heterogeneity desynchronizes population responses to electrical stimulation limiting inter-aural timing difference representation.

Authors:  Jesse M Resnick; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Microsecond interaural time difference discrimination restored by cochlear implants after neonatal deafness.

Authors:  Nicole Rosskothen-Kuhl; Alexa N Buck; Kongyan Li; Jan Wh Schnupp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Rabbits use both spectral and temporal cues to discriminate the fundamental frequency of harmonic complexes with missing fundamentals.

Authors:  Joseph D Wagner; Alice Gelman; Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Rate and Temporal Coding of Regular and Irregular Pulse Trains in Auditory Midbrain of Normal-Hearing and Cochlear-Implanted Rabbits.

Authors:  Yaqing Su; Yoojin Chung; Dan F M Goodman; Kenneth E Hancock; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.