Literature DB >> 27306672

Effect of current focusing on the sensitivity of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated stimulation.

Shefin S George1, Mohit N Shivdasani1, James B Fallon2.   

Abstract

In multichannel cochlear implants (CIs), current is delivered to specific electrodes along the cochlea in the form of amplitude-modulated pulse trains, to convey temporal and spectral cues. Our previous studies have shown that focused multipolar (FMP) and tripolar (TP) stimulation produce more restricted neural activation and reduced channel interactions in the inferior colliculus (IC) compared with traditional monopolar (MP) stimulation, suggesting that focusing of stimulation could produce better transmission of spectral information. The present study explored the capability of IC neurons to detect modulated CI stimulation with FMP and TP stimulation compared with MP stimulation. The study examined multiunit responses of IC neurons in acutely deafened guinea pigs by systematically varying the stimulation configuration, modulation depth, and stimulation level. Stimuli were sinusoidal amplitude-modulated pulse trains (carrier rate of 120 pulses/s). Modulation sensitivity was quantified by measuring modulation detection thresholds (MDTs), defined as the lowest modulation depth required to differentiate the response of a modulated stimulus from an unmodulated one. Whereas MP stimulation showed significantly lower MDTs than FMP and TP stimulation (P values <0.05) at stimulation ≤2 dB above threshold, all stimulation configurations were found to have similar modulation sensitivities at 4 dB above threshold. There was no difference found in modulation sensitivity between FMP and TP stimulation. The present study demonstrates that current focusing techniques such as FMP and TP can adequately convey amplitude modulation and are comparable to MP stimulation, especially at higher stimulation levels, although there may be some trade-off between spectral and temporal fidelity with current focusing stimulation.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implant; current focusing; inferior colliculus; modulation detection; multipolar stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27306672      PMCID: PMC5013173          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00126.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  63 in total

1.  Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  B S Krishna; M N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Functional architecture of auditory cortex.

Authors:  Heather L Read; Jeffery A Winer; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants in acutely deafened cats.

Authors:  Shefin S George; Andrew K Wise; Mohit N Shivdasani; Robert K Shepherd; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Sensorineural hearing loss during development: morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem.

Authors:  N A Hardie; R K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Cochlear implant use following neonatal deafness influences the cochleotopic organization of the primary auditory cortex in cats.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Dexter R F Irvine; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Il Joon Moon; Sunhwa Jin; Heesung Park; Jihwan Woo; Yang-Sun Cho; Won-Ho Chung; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Temporal Envelope Coding by Inferior Colliculus Neurons with Cochlear Implant Stimulation.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Martin F McKinney; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.