OBJECTIVE: To compare the assessment of cardiac output (CO) in children using the noninvasive Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM) with the invasive pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) thermodilution cardiac output measurement. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study in a tertiary center for pediatric cardiology of a university children's hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-four pediatric patients with congenital heart disease without shunt undergoing cardiac catheterization under general anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: CO was measured by USCOM using a suprasternal CO Doppler probe in children undergoing cardiac catheterization. USCOM data were compared to CO simultaneously measured by PAC thermodilution technique. Measurements were repeated three times within 5 min in each patient. A mean percentage error not exceeding 30% was defined as indicating clinical useful reliability of the USCOM. CO values measured by PAC ranged from 1.3 to 5.3 l/min (median 3.6 l/min). Bias and precision were -0.13 and 1.34 l/min, respectively. The mean percentage error of CO measurement by the USCOM compared to PAC thermodilution technique was 36.4% for USCOM. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data demonstrate that cardiac output measurement in children using the USCOM does not reliably represent absolute CO values as compared to PAC thermodilution. Further studies must evaluate the impact of incorporating effective aortic valve diameters on CO measurement using the USCOM.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the assessment of cardiac output (CO) in children using the noninvasive Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM) with the invasive pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) thermodilution cardiac output measurement. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study in a tertiary center for pediatric cardiology of a university children's hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-four pediatric patients with congenital heart disease without shunt undergoing cardiac catheterization under general anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: CO was measured by USCOM using a suprasternal CO Doppler probe in children undergoing cardiac catheterization. USCOM data were compared to CO simultaneously measured by PAC thermodilution technique. Measurements were repeated three times within 5 min in each patient. A mean percentage error not exceeding 30% was defined as indicating clinical useful reliability of the USCOM. CO values measured by PAC ranged from 1.3 to 5.3 l/min (median 3.6 l/min). Bias and precision were -0.13 and 1.34 l/min, respectively. The mean percentage error of CO measurement by the USCOM compared to PAC thermodilution technique was 36.4% for USCOM. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data demonstrate that cardiac output measurement in children using the USCOM does not reliably represent absolute CO values as compared to PAC thermodilution. Further studies must evaluate the impact of incorporating effective aortic valve diameters on CO measurement using the USCOM.
Authors: Karsten Knobloch; Artur Lichtenberg; Michael Winterhalter; Dagmar Rossner; Max Pichlmaier; Rob Phillips Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Jonathan R Egan; Marino Festa; Andrew D Cole; Graham R Nunn; Jonathan Gillis; David S Winlaw Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-02-15 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Fernando Beltramo; Jandavid Menteer; Asma Razavi; Robinder G Khemani; Jacqueline Szmuszkovicz; Christopher J L Newth; Patrick A Ross Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Fernando Beltramo; Jondavid Menteer; Asma Razavi; Robinder G Khemani; Jacqueline Szmuszkovicz; Christopher J L Newth; Patrick A Ross Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: H Bryant Nguyen; Daryl P Banta; Gail Stewart; Tommy Kim; Ramesh Bansal; James Anholm; William A Wittlake; Stephen W Corbett Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2010-06-20 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Fernando Beltramo; Jondavid Menteer; Asma Razavi; Robinder G Khemani; Jacqueline Szmuszkovicz; Christopher J L Newth; Patrick A Ross Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2015-09-12 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Sophia Horster; Hans-Joachim Stemmler; Nina Strecker; Florian Brettner; Andreas Hausmann; Jitske Cnossen; Klaus G Parhofer; Thomas Nickel; Sandra Geiger Journal: Crit Care Res Pract Date: 2011-11-29