Literature DB >> 18297271

Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of the Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor with thermodilution cardiac output measurement.

Walter Knirsch1, Oliver Kretschmar, Maren Tomaske, Kathrina Stutz, Nicole Nagdyman, Christian Balmer, Achim Schmitz, Dominique Béttex, Felix Berger, Urs Bauersfeld, Markus Weiss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the assessment of cardiac output (CO) in children using the noninvasive Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM) with the invasive pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) thermodilution cardiac output measurement. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Prospective observational study in a tertiary center for pediatric cardiology of a university children's hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-four pediatric patients with congenital heart disease without shunt undergoing cardiac catheterization under general anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: CO was measured by USCOM using a suprasternal CO Doppler probe in children undergoing cardiac catheterization. USCOM data were compared to CO simultaneously measured by PAC thermodilution technique. Measurements were repeated three times within 5 min in each patient. A mean percentage error not exceeding 30% was defined as indicating clinical useful reliability of the USCOM. CO values measured by PAC ranged from 1.3 to 5.3 l/min (median 3.6 l/min). Bias and precision were -0.13 and 1.34 l/min, respectively. The mean percentage error of CO measurement by the USCOM compared to PAC thermodilution technique was 36.4% for USCOM.
CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data demonstrate that cardiac output measurement in children using the USCOM does not reliably represent absolute CO values as compared to PAC thermodilution. Further studies must evaluate the impact of incorporating effective aortic valve diameters on CO measurement using the USCOM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18297271     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1030-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  17 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Rajesh Chand; Yatin Mehta; Naresh Trehan
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit.

Authors:  H L Tan; M Pinder; R Parsons; B Roberts; P V van Heerden
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Non-invasive cardiac output determination by two-dimensional independent Doppler during and after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Karsten Knobloch; Artur Lichtenberg; Michael Winterhalter; Dagmar Rossner; Max Pichlmaier; Rob Phillips
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Clinical assessment of cardiac performance in infants and children following cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan R Egan; Marino Festa; Andrew D Cole; Graham R Nunn; Jonathan Gillis; David S Winlaw
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs.

Authors:  Lester A Critchley; Zhi Y Peng; Benny S Fok; Anna Lee; Robert A Phillips
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  A comparison of thermodilution and pulsed Doppler cardiac output measurement in critically ill children.

Authors:  D A Notterman; F V Castello; C Steinberg; B M Greenwald; J E O'Loughlin; J P Gold
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Accuracy of the BoMED NCCOM3 bioimpedance cardiac output monitor during induced hypotension: an experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  J Tibballs; M Hochmann; A Osborne; B Carter
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.669

10.  A prospective clinical audit of central venous catheter use and complications in 1000 consecutive patients.

Authors:  C S Webster; A F Merry; D J Emmens; I C Van Cotthem; R L Holland
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.669

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy and precision of minimally-invasive cardiac output monitoring in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Koichi Suehiro; Alexandre Joosten; Linda Suk-Ling Murphy; Olivier Desebbe; Brenton Alexander; Sang-Hyun Kim; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Reply to Letter to the Editor.

Authors:  Fernando Beltramo; Jandavid Menteer; Asma Razavi; Robinder G Khemani; Jacqueline Szmuszkovicz; Christopher J L Newth; Patrick A Ross
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Letter to Editor: Reliability of the Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor for Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Fernando Beltramo; Jondavid Menteer; Asma Razavi; Robinder G Khemani; Jacqueline Szmuszkovicz; Christopher J L Newth; Patrick A Ross
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Continuous arterial pressure waveform monitoring in pediatric cardiac transplant, cardiomyopathy and pulmonary hypertension patients.

Authors:  Sarena Teng; Jon Kaufman; Zhaoxing Pan; Angela Czaja; Heather Shockley; Eduardo da Cruz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Cardiac index measurements by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound and transthoracic echocardiography in adult and pediatric emergency patients.

Authors:  H Bryant Nguyen; Daryl P Banta; Gail Stewart; Tommy Kim; Ramesh Bansal; James Anholm; William A Wittlake; Stephen W Corbett
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Capability of a new paediatric oesophageal Doppler monitor to detect changes in cardiac output during testing of external pacemakers after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Thilo Fleck; Stephan Schubert; Brigitte Stiller; Matthias Redlin; Peter Ewert; Nicole Nagdyman; Felix Berger
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM™) Measurements Prove Unreliable Compared to Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Adolescents with Cardiac Disease.

Authors:  Avichai Weissbach; Amichay Rotstein; Yaniv Lakovsky; Eytan Kaplan; Gili Kadmon; Einat Birk; Elhanan Nahum
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Validation of an Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor as a Bedside Tool for Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Fernando Beltramo; Jondavid Menteer; Asma Razavi; Robinder G Khemani; Jacqueline Szmuszkovicz; Christopher J L Newth; Patrick A Ross
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Urgent ultrasound guided hemodynamic assessments by a pediatric medical emergency team: a pilot study.

Authors:  David J Zorko; Karen Choong; Jonathan Gilleland; Barbara Agar; Shawn Baker; Cindy Brennan; Eleanor Pullenayegum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO.

Authors:  Sophia Horster; Hans-Joachim Stemmler; Nina Strecker; Florian Brettner; Andreas Hausmann; Jitske Cnossen; Klaus G Parhofer; Thomas Nickel; Sandra Geiger
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2011-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.