Literature DB >> 12635401

A prospective clinical audit of central venous catheter use and complications in 1000 consecutive patients.

C S Webster1, A F Merry, D J Emmens, I C Van Cotthem, R L Holland.   

Abstract

We conducted a prospective audit of central venous catheter (CVC) use in 1000 consecutive patients to better define the rates of postoperative complications (particularly vascular perforation) and the pattern of CVC and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) usage (particularly the number of lumens inserted and utilized). Details of CVCs, complications, and the number of lumens in place and used, were recorded daily until all CVCs were removed. A total of 1546 CVCs and 223 PACs were placed in study patients. Two non-fatal perforations occurred: a perforated right atrium in a patient who received an Arrow triple-lumen CVC (previously reported), and a perforated pulmonary artery in a patient upon withdrawal of a Baxter PAC. The risk per patient of any CVC-related perforation was 0.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.02% to 0.7%). The rates of CVC-related sepsis and local infection were 3% (95% CI: 2% to 4%) and 2% (95% CI: 1% to 3%) respectively. At the peak of CVC use (day 1 in the ICU) the overall number of lumens placed was significantly correlated with lumens used (r = 0.53), endorsing clinical judgement in the anticipation of the needs of the patient. The modal number of lumen uses in adults and children was four. However, in children, fewer catheters were inserted per patient than in adults (1.28 vs 1.63, P = 0.01), and placed lumens were used more intensively (P < 0.001). Data appear to justify the routine selection of a triple-lumen CVC in adult patients, but not of a quad-lumen CVC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12635401     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X0303100116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  4 in total

1.  Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of the Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor with thermodilution cardiac output measurement.

Authors:  Walter Knirsch; Oliver Kretschmar; Maren Tomaske; Kathrina Stutz; Nicole Nagdyman; Christian Balmer; Achim Schmitz; Dominique Béttex; Felix Berger; Urs Bauersfeld; Markus Weiss
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Safer cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Alan F Merry
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2009-12

Review 3.  Randomized controlled trials in central vascular access devices: A scoping review.

Authors:  Mari Takashima; Gillian Ray-Barruel; Amanda Ullman; Samantha Keogh; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Hemodynamic monitoring and management of pediatric septic shock.

Authors:  En-Pei Lee; Han-Ping Wu; Oi-Wa Chan; Jainn-Jim Lin; Shao-Hsuan Hsia
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 7.892

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.