Literature DB >> 15728064

Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs.

Lester A Critchley1, Zhi Y Peng, Benny S Fok, Anna Lee, Robert A Phillips.   

Abstract

We have used an animal model to test the reliability of a new portable continuous-wave Doppler ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM. In six anesthetized dogs, cardiac output was measured with a high-precision transit time ultrasonic flowprobe placed on the ascending aorta. The dogs' cardiac output was increased with a dopamine infusion (0-15 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Simultaneous flowprobe and USCOM cardiac output measurements were made. Up to 64 pairs of readings were collected from each dog. Data were compared by using the Bland and Altman plot method and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. A total of 319 sets of paired readings were collected. The mean (+/-sd) cardiac output was 2.62 +/- 1.04 L/min, and readings ranged from 0.79 to 5.73 L/min. The mean bias between the 2 sets of readings was -0.0l L/min, with limits of agreement (95% confidence intervals) of -0.34 to 0.31 L/min. This represents a +/-13% error. In five of six dogs, there was a high degree of concordance, or agreement, between the 2 methods, with coefficients >0.9. The USCOM provided reliable measurements of cardiac output over a wide range of values. Clinical trials are needed to validate the device in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15728064     DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000144774.42408.05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  17 in total

1.  The effect of head up tilting on bioreactance cardiac output and stroke volume readings using suprasternal transcutaneous Doppler as a control in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Lester A H Critchley; Daniel C W Lee; Kim S Khaw; Shara W Y Lee
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Does using two Doppler cardiac output monitors in tandem provide a reliable trend line of changes for validation studies?

Authors:  Huang Li; Lester A H Critchley; Jie Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  In vitro evaluation of an ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) device.

Authors:  Shaun D Gregory; Helena Cooney; Sara Diab; Chris Anstey; Ogilvie Thom; John F Fraser
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  A comparison of the non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the oesophageal Doppler monitor during major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Luke E Hodgson; Lui G Forni; Richard Venn; Theophilus L Samuels; Howard G Wakeling
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2015-10-14

5.  Measuring the cardiac output in acute emergency admissions: use of the non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with determination of the learning curve and inter-rater reliability.

Authors:  Luke E Hodgson; Richard Venn; Lui G Forni; Theophilus L Samuels; Howard G Wakeling
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2015-12-10

6.  Cardiac index measurements by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound and transthoracic echocardiography in adult and pediatric emergency patients.

Authors:  H Bryant Nguyen; Daryl P Banta; Gail Stewart; Tommy Kim; Ramesh Bansal; James Anholm; William A Wittlake; Stephen W Corbett
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  USCOM-window to the circulation: utility of supra-sternal Doppler in an elderly anaesthetized patient for a robotic cystectomy.

Authors:  Lester A H Critchley; Li Huang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM™) Measurements Prove Unreliable Compared to Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Adolescents with Cardiac Disease.

Authors:  Avichai Weissbach; Amichay Rotstein; Yaniv Lakovsky; Eytan Kaplan; Gili Kadmon; Einat Birk; Elhanan Nahum
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of the Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor with thermodilution cardiac output measurement.

Authors:  Walter Knirsch; Oliver Kretschmar; Maren Tomaske; Kathrina Stutz; Nicole Nagdyman; Christian Balmer; Achim Schmitz; Dominique Béttex; Felix Berger; Urs Bauersfeld; Markus Weiss
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Validation of an Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor as a Bedside Tool for Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Fernando Beltramo; Jondavid Menteer; Asma Razavi; Robinder G Khemani; Jacqueline Szmuszkovicz; Christopher J L Newth; Patrick A Ross
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 1.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.