Literature DB >> 18243828

Ethical aspects arising from non-invasive fetal diagnosis.

Ainsley J Newson1.   

Abstract

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) could significantly change the framework for testing and screening in pregnancy. This chapter reviews the ethical implications of this technology, including current issues in prenatal diagnosis, implications for informed consent, possible non-medical uses and options for regulation. The prospect of NIPD normalising screening and termination in pregnancy is raised as a concern. NIPD will also require monitoring to ensure women are making well-informed decisions, given that a risk to the pregnancy is absent. The question of whether NIPD will reduce anxiety needs to be established and the prospect that it will increase terminations on the grounds of disability should be recognised. The offer of NIPD external to any clinical oversight might give rise to wider social sex selection, paternity testing or testing 'for information'. The value assumptions of these uses of NIPD need to be addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18243828     DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2007.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1744-165X            Impact factor:   3.926


  28 in total

1.  A new era in prenatal testing: are we prepared?

Authors:  Dagmar Schmitz
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2013-08

2.  "This lifetime commitment": Public conceptions of disability and noninvasive prenatal genetic screening.

Authors:  Rosemary J Steinbach; Megan Allyse; Marsha Michie; Emily Y Liu; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Cell-free fetal DNA and non-invasive prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Imran Rafi; Lyn Chitty
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Genetic Counselors' Perspectives About Cell-Free DNA: Experiences, Challenges, and Expectations for Obstetricians.

Authors:  Patricia K Agatisa; Mary Beth Mercer; Marissa Coleridge; Ruth M Farrell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues explored.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Suzanne G M Frints; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Prenatal testing for Down syndrome: comparison of screening practices in the UK and USA.

Authors:  Dagmar Tapon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Should non-invasiveness change informed consent procedures for prenatal diagnosis?

Authors:  Zuzana Deans; Ainsley J Newson
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2011-06

8.  Variables influencing pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  Anne Hawkins; Ana Stenzel; Joanne Taylor; Valerie Y Chock; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 9.  Ethical, legal, social, and policy implications of behavioral genetics.

Authors:  Colleen M Berryessa; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 8.929

10.  Best ethical practices for clinicians and laboratories in the provision of noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  M A Allyse; L C Sayres; M Havard; J S King; H T Greely; L Hudgins; J Taylor; M E Norton; M K Cho; D Magnus; K E Ormond
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.050

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.