Literature DB >> 23001505

Variables influencing pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormalities.

Anne Hawkins1, Ana Stenzel, Joanne Taylor, Valerie Y Chock, Louanne Hudgins.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify variables that may influence the decision to terminate or continue a pregnancy affected by a chromosome abnormality. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 286 pregnancies diagnosed with a chromosome abnormality following genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis. Data obtained included procedure type, chromosome results, ethnicity, maternal age, use of fertility treatments, and uptake of genetic counseling after results, among other factors. Wilcoxon rank sum test, Fisher's exact test, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used for data analysis. The overall termination rate in this study was 82.9 %. A lower likelihood to terminate was found in pregnancies with a diagnosis of a sex chromosome abnormality (OR 0.05, p < .0001), Filipina race (OR 0.10, p = .03), and uptake of second genetic counseling session (OR 0.05, p < .0001). Prior history of termination was associated with increased likelihood to terminate (OR 8.6, p = .02). Factors revealing no statistically significant association with termination included maternal age, gestational age, clinic site, fetal gender, ultrasound anomalies, reason for referral and who informed the patient. Our data affirm the complexity of the decision making process and reinforce that providers should refrain from making assumptions regarding a patient's likelihood to terminate based on factors such as maternal age, gestational age, type of procedure, or ultrasound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001505     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9539-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  42 in total

1.  Beyond race or ethnicity and socioeconomic status: predictors of prenatal testing for Down syndrome.

Authors:  Miriam Kuppermann; Lee A Learman; Elena Gates; Steven E Gregorich; Robert F Nease; James Lewis; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Variation in the decision to terminate pregnancy in the setting of fetal aneuploidy.

Authors:  Brian L Shaffer; Aaron B Caughey; Mary E Norton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi; Lawrence D Platt; James D Goldberg; Alfred Z Abuhamad; Amy J Sehnert; Richard P Rava
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Parental decisions to abort or continue a pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in a setting where termination of pregnancy is not legally available.

Authors:  Roberto Quadrelli; Andrea Quadrelli; Búrix Mechoso; Mauricio Laufer; Ciro Jaumandreu; Alicia Vaglio
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 5.  Prenatal diagnosis: choices women make about pursuing testing and acting on abnormal results.

Authors:  P G Pryde; A Drugan; M P Johnson; N B Isada; M I Evans
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  Non-invasive prenatal assessment of trisomy 21 by multiplexed maternal plasma DNA sequencing: large scale validity study.

Authors:  Rossa W K Chiu; Ranjit Akolekar; Yama W L Zheng; Tak Y Leung; Hao Sun; K C Allen Chan; Fiona M F Lun; Attie T J I Go; Elizabeth T Lau; William W K To; Wing C Leung; Rebecca Y K Tang; Sidney K C Au-Yeung; Helena Lam; Yu Y Kung; Xiuqing Zhang; John M G van Vugt; Ryoko Minekawa; Mary H Y Tang; Jun Wang; Cees B M Oudejans; Tze K Lau; Kypros H Nicolaides; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-01-11

7.  Noninvasive prenatal testing/noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: the position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Patricia L Devers; Amy Cronister; Kelly E Ormond; Flavia Facio; Campbell K Brasington; Pamela Flodman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Decisions about testing and termination of pregnancy for different fetal conditions: a qualitative study of European White and Pakistani mothers of affected children.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Jenny Hewison; Josephine M Green; Howard S Cuckle; Janet Hirst; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Favorable attitudes toward testing for chromosomal abnormalities via analysis of fetal cells in maternal blood.

Authors:  S T Zamerowski; M A Lumley; R A Arreola; K Dukes; L Sullivan
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  DNA sequencing of maternal plasma reliably identifies trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 as well as Down syndrome: an international collaborative study.

Authors:  Glenn E Palomaki; Cosmin Deciu; Edward M Kloza; Geralyn M Lambert-Messerlian; James E Haddow; Louis M Neveux; Mathias Ehrich; Dirk van den Boom; Allan T Bombard; Wayne W Grody; Stanley F Nelson; Jacob A Canick
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  11 in total

1.  Investigating Pregnancy Outcomes After Abnormal Cell-Free DNA Test Results.

Authors:  Jessica Lu; Devereux N Saller; Luanne M Fraer; Beatrice A Chen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Parent Perspectives of Support Received from Physicians and/or Genetic Counselors Following a Decision to Continue a Pregnancy with a Prenatal Diagnosis of Trisomy 13/18.

Authors:  Stephanie E Wallace; Sara Gilvary; Michael J Smith; Siobhan M Dolan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  A Qualitative Study of Factors Influencing Decision-Making after Prenatal Diagnosis of down Syndrome.

Authors:  Amy R Reed; Kathryn L Berrier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Epistemic Virtue, Prospective Parents and Disability Abortion.

Authors:  James B Gould
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 1.352

5.  We want what's best for our baby: Prenatal Parenting of Babies with Lethal Conditions.

Authors:  Denise Côté-Arsenault; Heidi Krowchuk; Wendasha Jenkins Hall; Erin Denney-Koelsch
Journal:  J Prenat Perinat Psychol Health       Date:  2015-03

6.  Parental decisions following prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities: implications for genetic counseling practice in Japan.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Suzumori; Kyoko Kumagai; Shinobu Goto; Akira Nakamura; Mayumi Sugiura-Ogasawara
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  The decision to continue a pregnancy affected by Down syndrome: timing of decision and satisfaction with receiving a prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Emily Hurford; Anne Hawkins; Louanne Hudgins; Joanne Taylor
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  NIPT in a clinical setting: an analysis of uptake in the first months of clinical availability.

Authors:  Joanne B Taylor; Valerie Y Chock; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Pregnancy Outcome following Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Anomaly: A Record Linkage Study of 26,261 Pregnancies.

Authors:  Myrthe Jacobs; Sally-Ann Cooper; Ruth McGowan; Scott M Nelson; Jill P Pell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Older mothers and increased impact of prenatal screening: stable livebirth prevalence of trisomy 21 in the Netherlands for the period 2000-2013.

Authors:  Maurike D de Groot-van der Mooren; Saskia Tamminga; Dick Oepkes; Michel E Weijerman; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.