Literature DB >> 23613322

Best ethical practices for clinicians and laboratories in the provision of noninvasive prenatal testing.

M A Allyse1, L C Sayres, M Havard, J S King, H T Greely, L Hudgins, J Taylor, M E Norton, M K Cho, D Magnus, K E Ormond.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to provide an ethical framework for clinicians and companies providing noninvasive prenatal testing using cell-free fetal DNA or whole fetal cells.
METHOD: In collaboration with a National Institutes of Health-supported research ethics consultation committee together with feedback from an interdisciplinary group of clinicians, members of industry, legal experts, and genetic counselors, we developed a set of best practices for the provision of noninvasive prenatal genetic testing.
RESULTS: Principal recommendations include the amendment of current informed consent procedures to include attention to the noninvasive nature of new testing and the potential for a broader range of results earlier in the pregnancy. We strongly recommend that tests should only be provided through licensed medical providers and not directly to consumers.
CONCLUSION: Prenatal tests, including new methods using cell-free fetal DNA, are not currently regulated by government agencies, and limited professional guidance is available. In the absence of regulation, companies and clinicians should cooperate to adopt responsible best ethical practices in the provision of these tests.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23613322      PMCID: PMC4057377          DOI: 10.1002/pd.4144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  49 in total

1.  Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.

Authors:  Vardit Ravitsky; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 2.  Ethical aspects arising from non-invasive fetal diagnosis.

Authors:  Ainsley J Newson
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Trends in the utilization of invasive prenatal diagnosis in The Netherlands during 2000-2009.

Authors:  Klaske D Lichtenbelt; Behrooz Z Alizadeh; Peter G Scheffer; Philip Stoutenbeek; Peter C J I Schielen; Lieve C M L Page-Christiaens; G Heleen Schuring-Blom
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Informed consent for PSA screening: does it happen?

Authors:  D G Federman; S Goyal; A Kamina; P Peduzzi; J Concato
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug

5.  Disability rights, prenatal diagnosis and eugenics: a cross-cultural view.

Authors:  Aviad E Raz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Informed decision making in the context of prenatal screening.

Authors:  Matthijs van den Berg; Danielle R M Timmermans; Leo P ten Kate; John M G van Vugt; Gerrit van der Wal
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-10-20

7.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 363: patient testing: ethical issues in selection and counseling.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Educational material about genetic tests: does it provide key information for patients and practitioners?

Authors:  M K Cho; M Arruda; N A Holtzman
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1997-12-19

9.  How important is consent in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome in France? Information and consent evaluation in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: a French study.

Authors:  Romain Favre; Nathalie Duchange; Christophe Vayssière; Monique Kohler; Nicole Bouffard; Marie-Chrsitine Hunsinger; Anne Kohler; Cécile Mager; Muriel Neumann; Christine Vayssière; Brigitte Viville; Christian Hervé; Grégoire Moutel
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement.

Authors:  Timothy Caulfield; Amy L McGuire; Mildred Cho; Janet A Buchanan; Michael M Burgess; Ursula Danilczyk; Christina M Diaz; Kelly Fryer-Edwards; Shane K Green; Marc A Hodosh; Eric T Juengst; Jane Kaye; Laurence Kedes; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Trudo Lemmens; Eric M Meslin; Juli Murphy; Robert L Nussbaum; Margaret Otlowski; Daryl Pullman; Peter N Ray; Jeremy Sugarman; Michael Timmons
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  21 in total

1.  Consenting for molecular diagnostics.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Genomic testing reaches into the womb.

Authors:  Malorye Allison
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Genetic Counselors' Perspectives About Cell-Free DNA: Experiences, Challenges, and Expectations for Obstetricians.

Authors:  Patricia K Agatisa; Mary Beth Mercer; Marissa Coleridge; Ruth M Farrell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Human-subjects research: The ethics squad.

Authors:  Elie Dolgin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Perspectives of Pregnant People and Clinicians on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Meredith Vanstone; Alexandra Cernat; Umair Majid; Forum Trivedi; Chanté De Freitas
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

Review 6.  Pre- and post-test genetic counseling for chromosomal and Mendelian disorders.

Authors:  Jill Fonda Allen; Katie Stoll; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.300

7.  Noninvasive prenatal testing goes global.

Authors:  Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Mollie A Minear; Anthony Hung; Megan Allyse
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  Talking Points: Women's Information Needs for Informed Decision-Making About Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Aimée C Dane; Madelyn Peterson; Yvette D Miller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomies 21, 18, and 13, Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies, and Microdeletions: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

10.  "I think we've got too many tests!": Prenatal providers' reflections on ethical and clinical challenges in the practice integration of cell-free DNA screening.

Authors:  B L Gammon; S A Kraft; M Michie; M Allyse
Journal:  Ethics Med Public Health       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.