Literature DB >> 18217824

The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading.

Gordon E Legge1, Sing-Hang Cheung, Deyue Yu, Susana T L Chung, Hye-Won Lee, Daniel P Owens.   

Abstract

The visual span for reading is the number of letters, arranged horizontally as in text, that can be recognized reliably without moving the eyes. The visual-span hypothesis states that the size of the visual span is an important factor that limits reading speed. From this hypothesis, we predict that changes in reading speed as a function of character size or contrast are determined by corresponding changes in the size of the visual span. We tested this prediction in two experiments in which we measured the size of the visual span and reading speed on groups of five subjects as a function of either character size or character contrast. We used a "trigram method" for characterizing the visual span as a profile of letter-recognition accuracy as a function of distance left and right of the midline (G. E. Legge, J. S. Mansfield, & S. T. L. Chung, 2001). The area under this profile was taken as an operational measure of the size of the visual span. Reading speed was measured with the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) method. We found that the size of the visual span and reading speed showed the same qualitative dependence on character size and contrast, reached maximum values at the same critical points, and exhibited high correlations at the level of individual subjects. Additional analysis of data from four studies provides evidence for an invariant relationship between the size of the visual span and RSVP reading speed; an increase in the visual span by one letter is associated with a 39% increase in reading speed. Our results confirm the visual-span hypothesis and provide a theoretical framework for understanding the impact of stimulus attributes, such as contrast and character size, on reading speed. Evidence for the visual span as a determinant of reading speed implies the existence of a bottom-up, sensory limitation on reading, distinct from attentional, motor, or linguistic influences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18217824      PMCID: PMC2729064          DOI: 10.1167/7.2.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  30 in total

1.  The effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: the SERIOL model and selective literature review.

Authors:  C Whitney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

3.  Letter-recognition and reading speed in peripheral vision benefit from perceptual learning.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Gordon E Legge; Sing-hang Cheung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Visual sensory units and the minimal angle of resolution.

Authors:  F W WEYMOUTH
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1958-07       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Reading without saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  G S Rubin; K Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Pixel independence: measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Psychophysics of reading--XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; S J Ahn; T S Klitz; A Luebker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Visual requirements for reading.

Authors:  S G Whittaker; J Lovie-Kitchin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well; A Pollatsek
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-06

10.  Low vision reading with sequential word presentation.

Authors:  G S Rubin; K Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  54 in total

1.  The effect of dioptric blur on reading performance.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Samuel H Jarvis; Sing-Hang Cheung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Sing-Hang Cheung; Gordon E Legge; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Sensory and cognitive influences on the training-related improvement of reading speed in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Gordon E Legge; Deyue Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Learning to identify crowded letters: does it improve reading speed?

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Training peripheral vision to read: Boosting the speed of letter processing.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Gordon E Legge; Gunther Wagoner; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Comparing the visual spans for faces and letters.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Jennifer M Scholz; Rachel Gage; Christopher S Kallie; Tingting Liu; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method.

Authors:  Timothy G Shepard; Fang Hou; Peter J Bex; Luis A Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Deyue Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 8.  Enhancing visual performance for people with central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  The link between reading ability and visual spatial attention across development.

Authors:  Alex L White; Geoffrey M Boynton; Jason D Yeatman
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Dependence of reading speed on letter spacing in central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.