Literature DB >> 18217817

Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed.

Deyue Yu1, Sing-Hang Cheung, Gordon E Legge, Susana T L Chung.   

Abstract

S. T. L. Chung (2002) has shown that rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) reading speed varies with letter spacing, peaking near the standard letter spacing for text and decreasing for both smaller and larger spacings. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the dependence of reading speed on letter spacing is mediated by the size of the visual span-the number of letters recognized with high accuracy without moving the eyes. If so, the size of the visual span and reading speed should show a similar dependence on letter spacing. We tested this prediction for RSVP reading and asked whether it generalizes to the reading of blocks of text requiring eye movements. We measured visual-span profiles and reading speeds as a function of letter spacing. Visual-span profiles, measured with trigrams (strings of three random letters), are plots of letter-recognition accuracy as a function of letter position left or right of fixation. Size of the visual span was quantified by a measure of the area under the visual-span profile. Reading performance was measured using two presentation methods: RSVP and flashcard (a short block of text on four lines). We found that the size of the visual span and the reading speeds measured by the two presentation methods showed a qualitatively similar dependence on letter spacing and that they were highly correlated. These results are consistent with the view that the size of the visual span is a primary visual factor that limits reading speed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18217817      PMCID: PMC2729067          DOI: 10.1167/7.2.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  14 in total

1.  Reading with fixed and variable character pitch.

Authors:  A Arditi; K Knoblauch; I Grunwald
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test.

Authors:  G E Legge; J A Ross; A Luebker; J M LaMay
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading.

Authors:  Gordon E Legge; Sing-Hang Cheung; Deyue Yu; Susana T L Chung; Hye-Won Lee; Daniel P Owens
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision.

Authors:  S T Chung; J S Mansfield; G E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Pixel independence: measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Psychophysics of reading--XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; S J Ahn; T S Klitz; A Luebker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition.

Authors:  H Bouma
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Psychophysics of reading--II. Low vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; G S Rubin; D G Pelli; M M Schleske
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Mr. Chips 2002: new insights from an ideal-observer model of reading.

Authors:  Gordon E Legge; Thomas A Hooven; Timothy S Klitz; J Stephen Stephen Mansfield; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  50 in total

1.  Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia.

Authors:  Marco Zorzi; Chiara Barbiero; Andrea Facoetti; Isabella Lonciari; Marco Carrozzi; Marcella Montico; Laura Bravar; Florence George; Catherine Pech-Georgel; Johannes C Ziegler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The mechanism of word crowding.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Melanie M U Akau; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Effects of increased letter spacing on word identification and eye guidance during reading.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

4.  Locating the cortical bottleneck for slow reading in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Yi Jiang; Gordon E Legge; Sheng He
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Shift in spatial scale in identifying crowded letters.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading.

Authors:  Gordon E Legge; Sing-Hang Cheung; Deyue Yu; Susana T L Chung; Hye-Won Lee; Daniel P Owens
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Sensory and cognitive influences on the training-related improvement of reading speed in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Gordon E Legge; Deyue Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method.

Authors:  Timothy G Shepard; Fang Hou; Peter J Bex; Luis A Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Deyue Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Enhancing visual performance for people with central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Dependence of reading speed on letter spacing in central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.