Literature DB >> 9274784

Psychophysics of reading--XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision.

G E Legge1, S J Ahn, T S Klitz, A Luebker.   

Abstract

The visual span in reading is the number of characters that can be recognized at a glance. The shrinking visual span hypothesis attributes reading deficits in low vision, and slow reading in normal vision at low contrast, to a reduction in the visual span. This hypothesis predicts that reading time (msec/word) becomes increasingly dependent on word length as text contrast decreases. We tested and confirmed this prediction using the rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) method. Estimates of the visual span ranged from about 10 characters for high-contrast text to less than two characters for low-contrast text. Eye-movement recordings showed that longer reading times at low contrast are partitioned about equally between prolonged fixation times and an increased number of saccades (presumably related to a reduced visual span). RSVP measurements for six out of seven low-vision subjects revealed a strong dependence of reading time on word length, as expected from reduced visual spans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9274784     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00017-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  51 in total

Review 1.  [Dyslexia. Bases of reading. Reading-writing disorder. Ocular reading disorder].

Authors:  S Trauzettel-Klosinski; W D Schäfer; G Klosinski
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Aging and vision.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Sing-Hang Cheung; Gordon E Legge; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading.

Authors:  Gordon E Legge; Sing-Hang Cheung; Deyue Yu; Susana T L Chung; Hye-Won Lee; Daniel P Owens
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  An investigation of concurrent ERP and self-paced reading methodologies.

Authors:  Tali Ditman; Phillip J Holcomb; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Learning to read vertical text in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Ahalya Subramanian; Gordon E Legge; Gunther Harrison Wagoner; Deyue Yu
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  [Requirements for low vision magnification aids in age-related macular degeneration: Data from the Tübingen low vision clinic (comparison of 2007-2011 with 1999-2005)].

Authors:  E K Altpeter; N X Nguyen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Image jitter enhances visual performance when spatial resolution is impaired.

Authors:  Lynne M Watson; Niall C Strang; Fraser Scobie; Gordon D Love; Dirk Seidel; Velitchko Manahilov
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Comparing the visual spans for faces and letters.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Jennifer M Scholz; Rachel Gage; Christopher S Kallie; Tingting Liu; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 10.  Enhancing visual performance for people with central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.