Literature DB >> 8430009

Visual requirements for reading.

S G Whittaker1, J Lovie-Kitchin.   

Abstract

We have applied research on the visual psychophysics of reading to low vision assessment. Research on different aspects of the reading process found that reading rate rather than reading comprehension is more sensitive to variations in a subject's visual functioning or the stimulus properties of print. The research identified four different visual factors that significantly affect reading rate: (1) acuity reserve [print size relative to acuity threshold], (2) contrast reserve [print contrast relative to contrast threshold], (3) field of view [number of letters visible], and (4) in cases of maculopathy, central scotoma size. Our research indicates that fluent reading rates can be attained with a restricted field of view, as little as four characters. However, attainment of fluent reading levels requires that print size and contrast should be several times threshold and the diameter of a central scotoma should be less than 22 degrees. Although important clinical studies are lacking, we derived specific visual requirements for different reading rates from published experimental research to provide a starting point and to illustrate how visual requirements could be derived, even with poor correlations. Research has made significant progress toward the development of a comprehensive low vision assessment that will allow the practitioner to identify visual impediments to reading, other than reduced visual acuity. Having more fully characterized a visual impairment, the practitioner may tailor devices or interventions to the individual's needs and capabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8430009     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199301000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  72 in total

1.  Head mounted video magnification devices for low vision rehabilitation: a comparison with existing technology.

Authors:  R Harper; L Culham; C Dickinson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Improvement in near visual function after macular translocation surgery with 360-degree peripheral retinectomy.

Authors:  Cynthia A Toth; Deborah J Lapolice; Avie D Banks; Sandra S Stinnett
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06-05       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  [Ophthalmologic reading charts : Part 2: Current logarithmically scaled reading charts].

Authors:  W Radner
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  An unusual strategy for fixation in a patient with bilateral advanced age related macular disease.

Authors:  M D Crossland; S A Kabanarou; G S Rubin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  The relationship between word length and threshold character size in patients with central scotoma and eccentric fixation.

Authors:  Anouk Déruaz; Mira Goldschmidt; Christophe Mermoud; Andrew R Whatham; Avinoam B Safran
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.

Authors:  Kavitha Thayaparan; Michael D Crossland; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Predictions of postoperative visual outcome in subjects with cataract: a preoperative and postoperative study.

Authors:  William A Douthwaite; Marta Vianya-Estopà; David B Elliott
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-23       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Letter case and text legibility in normal and low vision.

Authors:  Aries Arditi; Jianna Cho
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Reading with optical magnifiers: page navigation strategies and difficulties.

Authors:  Alex Bowers; Allen M Y Cheong; Jan E Lovie-Kitchin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method.

Authors:  Timothy G Shepard; Fang Hou; Peter J Bex; Luis A Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Deyue Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.