Literature DB >> 18210091

[Metal sensitivity in patients with joint replacement arthroplasties before and after surgery].

C Rau1, P Thomas, M Thomsen.   

Abstract

The object of the present study was to determine the incidence of metal sensitivity in patients with joint replacement arthroplasties before and after surgery and whether this is of significance as regards the final outcome of the operative procedure. A questionnaire-based survey involved 1,335 patients with an average age of 61 years and joint replacement arthroplasties before and after surgery. A history of dermal sensitivity to metal was given in 99 (7%) patients with almost equal frequency in the pre- and postoperative groups (7.6 vs 7.2%). In only 27 of 99 cases was the metal sensitivity recorded in the patient chart. In 46 cases investigation was done after knee or hip replacement arthroplasty with an average implant time in situ of 68 months. In 32 of 46 patients a sensitivity to the implanted material was known and they did not show any complications related to the metal sensitivity.It is currently unclear whether metal sensitivity could be induced by joint replacement arthroplasties and it remains uncertain whether loosening or infection causes the sensitization as a consequence of increased release of metal ions or vice versa. To draw further conclusions considerably more detailed studies involving more patients are clearly indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18210091     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-007-1186-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  29 in total

Review 1.  Nickel dermatitis: problems solved and unsolved.

Authors:  H Möller
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  Early osteolysis following second-generation metal-on-metal hip replacement.

Authors:  Youn-Soo Park; Young-Wan Moon; Seung-Jae Lim; Jun-Mo Yang; Geunghwan Ahn; Yoon-La Choi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Sensitivity to titanium. A cause of implant failure?

Authors:  P A Lalor; P A Revell; A B Gray; S Wright; G T Railton; M A Freeman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-01

4.  Middle-term results of threaded acetabular cups. High failure rates five years after surgery.

Authors:  H G Simank; D R Brocai; D Reiser; M Thomsen; D Sabo; M Lukoschek
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-05

Review 5.  Distribution of cobalt chromium wear and corrosion products and biologic reactions.

Authors:  K Merritt; S A Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  N Hallab; K Merritt; J J Jacobs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Metal sensitivity in patients with joint replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  M K Benson; P G Goodwin; J Brostoff
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-11-15

8.  Widespread dissemination of metal debris from implants.

Authors:  C P Case; V G Langkamer; C James; M R Palmer; A J Kemp; P F Heap; L Solomon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-09

9.  Metal sensitivity in patients with metal-to-plastic total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  A S Carlsson; B Magnusson; H Möller
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1980-02

Review 10.  [Allergic reactions to implant materials].

Authors:  P Thomas
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.087

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Causes of failure and etiology of painful primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Romain Seil; Dietrich Pape
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Allergy in Total Knee Replacement. Does It Exist?: Review Article.

Authors:  Martin Faschingbauer; Lisa Renner; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-07-22

3.  [Association between allergy to benzoyl peroxide, vitiligo and implantation of a cemented total knee joint prosthesis: Is there a connection?].

Authors:  M Gothner; L Ozokyay; P Godau; T Kälicke; G Muhr; T A Schildhauer; M Dudda
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Complications of metal-on-metal tribological pairing].

Authors:  M Stiehler; F Zobel; F Hannemann; J Schmitt; J Lützner; S Kirschner; K-P Günther; A Hartmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  The painful knee after TKA: a diagnostic algorithm for failure analysis.

Authors:  S Hofmann; G Seitlinger; O Djahani; M Pietsch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  [Implant allergies].

Authors:  P Thomas; M Thomsen
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.751

7.  Wear in total knee arthroplasty--just a question of polyethylene?: Metal ion release in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jan Philippe Kretzer; Joern Reinders; Robert Sonntag; Sebastien Hagmann; Marcus Streit; Sebastian Jeager; Babak Moradi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  [Preclinical evaluation of coated knee implants for allergic patients].

Authors:  J Reich; L Hovy; H-L Lindenmaier; R Zeller; J Schwiesau; P Thomas; T M Grupp
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  [Use of allergy implants in Germany: results of a survey].

Authors:  M Thomsen; M Rozak; P Thomas
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Study rationale and protocol: prospective randomized comparison of metal ion concentrations in the patient's plasma after implantation of coated and uncoated total knee prostheses.

Authors:  Jörg Lützner; Gerd Dinnebier; Albrecht Hartmann; Klaus-Peter Günther; Stephan Kirschner
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.