Literature DB >> 19308644

Dynamical instability determines the effect of ongoing noise on neural firing.

David E O'Gorman1, John A White, Christopher A Shera.   

Abstract

At low stimulation rates, electrically stimulated auditory nerve fibers typically fire regularly, in lock-step to the applied stimulus. At high stimulation rates, however, these same fibers fire irregularly. Firing irregularity has been attributed to the random opening and closing of voltage-gated sodium channels at the spike generation site. We demonstrate, however, that the nonlinear dynamics of neural excitation and refractoriness embodied in the FitzHugh-Nagumo (FN) model produce realistic firing irregularity at high stimulus rates, even in the complete absence of ongoing physiological noise. Indeed, we show that ongoing noise can actually regularize the response at low discharge rates. The degree of stimulus-dependent irregularity is determined not so much by the level of ongoing physiological noise as by the dynamical instability. Our work suggests that the dynamical instability, quantified by the Lyapunov exponent, controls neural sensitivity to input signals and to physiological noise, as well the amount of mutual desynchronization between similarly stimulated fibers. This instability, quantified by the value of the Lyapunov exponent, may play a critical role in determining modulation sensitivity and dynamic range in cochlear implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19308644      PMCID: PMC2674196          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-008-0148-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  52 in total

1.  Subharmonic resonance and chaos in forced excitable systems.

Authors:  H G Othmer; M Xie
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Spontaneous activity of auditory-nerve fibers: insights into stochastic processes at ribbon synapses.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Dexter R F Irvine; Mel Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Curious oddments of auditory-nerve studies.

Authors:  N Y Kiang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein; B S Wilson; C C Finley; P J Abbas
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Will there be noise in their ears?

Authors:  F Moss; F Chiou-Tan; R Klinke
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  A nonrandom dynamic component in the synaptic noise of a central neuron.

Authors:  P Faure; H Korn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih) in primary auditory neurons.

Authors:  C Chen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  A model of neuronal bursting using three coupled first order differential equations.

Authors:  J L Hindmarsh; R M Rose
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1984-03-22

9.  Relationship between membrane excitability and single channel open-close kinetics.

Authors:  J R Clay; L J DeFelice
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Open set speech perception with auditory brainstem implant?

Authors:  Vittorio Colletti; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  5 in total

1.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Auditory sensitivity may require dynamically unstable spike generators: evidence from a model of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  David E O'Gorman; H Steven Colburn; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A biophysical model examining the role of low-voltage-activated potassium currents in shaping the responses of vestibular ganglion neurons.

Authors:  Ariel E Hight; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The transtympanic promontory stimulation test in patients with auditory deprivation: correlations with electrical dynamics of cochlear implant and speech perception.

Authors:  Mohammad Alfelasi; Jean Pierre Piron; Caroline Mathiolon; Nadjmah Lenel; Michel Mondain; Alain Uziel; Frederic Venail
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  A Model of Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber Responses with Peripheral and Central Sites of Spike Generation.

Authors:  Suyash Narendra Joshi; Torsten Dau; Bastian Epp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.