Literature DB >> 18193311

Comparison of three commercially available radio frequency coils for human brain imaging at 3 Tesla.

Ralf Mekle1, Wietske van der Zwaag, Andreas Joosten, Rolf Gruetter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a transverse electromagnetic (TEM), a circularly polarized (CP) (birdcage), and a 12-channel phased array head coil at the clinical field strength of B0 = 3T in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), signal homogeneity, and maps of the effective flip angle alpha.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: SNR measurements were performed on low flip angle gradient echo images. In addition, flip angle maps were generated for alpha(nominal) = 30 degrees using the double angle method. These evaluation steps were performed on phantom and human brain data acquired with each coil. Moreover, the signal intensity variation was computed for phantom data using five different regions of interest.
RESULTS: In terms of SNR, the TEM coil performs slightly better than the CP coil, but is second to the smaller 12-channel coil for human data. As expected, both the TEM and the CP coils show superior image intensity homogeneity than the 12-channel coil, and achieve larger mean effective flip angles than the combination of body and 12-channel coil with reduced radio frequency power deposition.
CONCLUSION: At 3T the benefits of TEM coil design over conventional lumped element(s) coil design start to emerge, though the phased array coil retains an advantage with respect to SNR performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18193311     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-007-0100-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  19 in total

1.  Radio frequency magnetic field mapping of a 3 Tesla birdcage coil: experimental and theoretical dependence on sample properties.

Authors:  M Alecci; C M Collins; M B Smith; P Jezzard
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Microstrip RF surface coil design for extremely high-field MRI and spectroscopy.

Authors:  X Zhang; K Ugurbil; W Chen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Different excitation and reception distributions with a single-loop transmit-receive surface coil near a head-sized spherical phantom at 300 MHz.

Authors:  C M Collins; Q X Yang; J H Wang; X Zhang; H Liu; S Michaeli; X-H Zhu; G Adriany; J T Vaughan; P Anderson; H Merkle; K Ugurbil; M B Smith; W Chen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  A microstrip transmission line volume coil for human head MR imaging at 4T.

Authors:  Xiaoliang Zhang; Kamil Ugurbil; Wei Chen
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  4 T actively detunable transmit/receive transverse electromagnetic coil and 4-channel receive-only phased array for (1)H human brain studies.

Authors:  Nikolai I Avdievich; Hoby P Hetherington
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Eight-channel phased array coil and detunable TEM volume coil for 7 T brain imaging.

Authors:  G C Wiggins; A Potthast; C Triantafyllou; C J Wiggins; L L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Electromagnetic perspective on the operation of RF coils at 1.5-11.7 Tesla.

Authors:  Tamer S Ibrahim; Chad Mitchell; Petra Schmalbrock; Robert Lee; Donald W Chakeres
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  B1 field, SAR, and SNR comparisons for birdcage, TEM, and microstrip coils at 7T.

Authors:  Chunsheng Wang; Gary X Shen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  An introduction to coil array design for parallel MRI.

Authors:  Michael A Ohliger; Daniel K Sodickson
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.044

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of image quality of a 32-channel versus a 12-channel head coil at 1.5T for MR imaging of the brain.

Authors:  P T Parikh; G S Sandhu; K A Blackham; M D Coffey; D Hsu; K Liu; J Jesberger; M Griswold; J L Sunshine
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Signal-to-noise ratio and parallel imaging performance of commercially available phased array coils in 3.0 T brain magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tsukasa Yoshida; Kensei Shirata; Atsushi Urikura; Michitoshi Ito; Yoshihiro Nakaya
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-05-26

3.  A combined 32-channel receive-loops/8-channel transmit-dipoles coil array for whole-brain MR imaging at 7T.

Authors:  Jérémie Clément; Rolf Gruetter; Özlem Ipek
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-05-12       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Prevalence of abnormal findings in 230 knees of asymptomatic adults using 3.0 T MRI.

Authors:  Laura M Horga; Anna C Hirschmann; Johann Henckel; Anastasia Fotiadou; Anna Di Laura; Camilla Torlasco; Andrew D'Silva; Sanjay Sharma; James C Moon; Alister J Hart
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.