Literature DB >> 16088934

Electromagnetic perspective on the operation of RF coils at 1.5-11.7 Tesla.

Tamer S Ibrahim1, Chad Mitchell, Petra Schmalbrock, Robert Lee, Donald W Chakeres.   

Abstract

In this work experimental and numerical studies of the MR signal were performed at frequencies ranging from 64 MHz to 485 MHz, utilizing three different MRI coils: a single-strut transverse electromagnetic (TEM)-based coil, a TEM resonator, and a high-pass birdcage coil. The experimental analyses were conducted using 1.5 and 8 Tesla whole-body systems and volume RF head coils. The simulation data were obtained utilizing an in-house-developed finite difference time domain (FDTD) model. Pertinent data from the numerical and experimental setups were compared, and a remarkable agreement between the two methods was found that clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of the FDTD method when it is applied rigorously. The numerical and experimental studies demonstrate the complexity of the electromagnetic (EM) fields and their role in the MR signal. These studies also reveal unique similarities and differences between the transmit and receive field distributions at various field strengths. Finally, for ultra high-field operations, it was demonstrated mathematically, numerically, and experimentally that highly asymmetric inhomogeneous images can be acquired even for linear excitation, symmetrical load geometries, and symmetrical load positioning within the coil. Copyright (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16088934     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of three commercially available radio frequency coils for human brain imaging at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Ralf Mekle; Wietske van der Zwaag; Andreas Joosten; Rolf Gruetter
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  MRI-based anatomical model of the human head for specific absorption rate mapping.

Authors:  Nikos Makris; Leonardo Angelone; Seann Tulloch; Scott Sorg; Jonathan Kaiser; David Kennedy; Giorgio Bonmassar
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Image homogenization using pre-emphasis method for high field MRI.

Authors:  Ye Li; Chunsheng Wang; Baiying Yu; Daniel Vigneron; Wei Chen; Xiaoliang Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2013-08

4.  Design and Test of Magnetic Wall Decoupling for Dipole Transmit/Receive Array for MR Imaging at the Ultrahigh Field of 7T.

Authors:  Xinqiang Yan; Xiaoliang Zhang; Long Wei; Rong Xue
Journal:  Appl Magn Reson       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 0.831

5.  RF Head Coil Design with Improved RF Magnetic Near-Fields Uniformity for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Systems.

Authors:  Sung-Min Sohn; Lance DelaBarre; Anand Gopinath; John Thomas Vaughan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  Studies of RF Shimming Techniques with Minimization of RF Power Deposition and Their Associated Temperature Changes.

Authors:  Lin Tang; Yik-Kiong Hue; Tamer S Ibrahim
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.176

7.  Ideal current patterns yielding optimal signal-to-noise ratio and specific absorption rate in magnetic resonance imaging: computational methods and physical insights.

Authors:  Riccardo Lattanzi; Daniel K Sodickson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Eight-Channel Monopole Array Using ICE Decoupling for Human Head MR Imaging at 7 T.

Authors:  Xinqiang Yan; Long Wei; Suoda Chu; Rong Xue; Xiaoliang Zhang
Journal:  Appl Magn Reson       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 0.831

9.  Understanding and manipulating the RF fields at high field MRI.

Authors:  Tamer S Ibrahim; Yik-Kiong Hue; Lin Tang
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  INTERCOMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE OF RF COIL GEOMETRIES FOR HIGH FIELD MOUSE CARDIAC MRI.

Authors:  Christakis Constantinides; S Angeli; S Gkagkarellis; G Cofer
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.