Literature DB >> 23205947

Task specificity and the influence of memory on visual search: comment on Võ and Wolfe (2012).

Andrew Hollingworth1.   

Abstract

Recent results from Võ and Wolfe (2012b) suggest that the application of memory to visual search may be task specific: Previous experience searching for an object facilitated later search for that object, but object information acquired during a different task did not appear to transfer to search. The latter inference depended on evidence that a preview task did not improve later search, but Võ and Wolfe used a relatively insensitive, between-subjects design. Here, we replicated the Võ and Wolfe study using a within-subject manipulation of scene preview. A preview session (focused either on object location memory or on the assessment of object semantics) reliably facilitated later search. In addition, information acquired from distractors in a scene-facilitated search when the distractor later became the target. Instead of being strongly constrained by task, visual memory is applied flexibly to guide attention and gaze during visual search.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23205947      PMCID: PMC3515208          DOI: 10.1037/a0030237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  21 in total

1.  The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living.

Authors:  M Land; N Mennie; J Rusted
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Voluntazy and automatic attentional control of visual working memory.

Authors:  Brandon K Schmidt; Edward K Vogel; Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-07

3.  The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Task demands control acquisition and storage of visual information.

Authors:  Jason A Droll; Mary M Hayhoe; Jochen Triesch; Brian T Sullivan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts.

Authors:  James R Brockmole; Monica S Castelhano; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays.

Authors:  Marc Pomplun
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Scene context guides eye movements during visual search.

Authors:  Mark B Neider; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search.

Authors:  Antonio Torralba; Aude Oliva; Monica S Castelhano; John M Henderson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  17 in total

1.  Priorities for representation: Task settings and object interaction both influence object memory.

Authors:  Clare Kirtley; Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

2.  Memory and prediction in natural gaze control.

Authors:  Gabriel Diaz; Joseph Cooper; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Yoriko Hirose; Sarah K Finnegan; Riina Pievilainen; Clare Kirtley; Alan Kennedy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Gist in time: Scene semantics and structure enhance recall of searched objects.

Authors:  Emilie L Josephs; Dejan Draschkow; Jeremy M Wolfe; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2016-06-03

Review 5.  Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

6.  The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-21

7.  Seek and you shall remember: scene semantics interact with visual search to build better memories.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Jeremy M Wolfe; Melissa L H Võ
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 8.  The role of memory for visual search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa Le-Hoa Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Contrasting gist-based and template-based guidance during real-world visual search.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Michi Matsukura; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Visual working memory modulates low-level saccade target selection: evidence from rapidly generated saccades in the global effect paradigm.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Michi Matsukura; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.