Literature DB >> 11050390

Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search.

I D Gilchrist1, M Harvey.   

Abstract

Visual search-looking for a target object in the presence of a number of distractor items-is an everyday activity for humans (for example, finding the car in a busy car park) and animals (for example, foraging for food). Our understanding of visual search has been enriched by an interdisciplinary effort using a wide range of research techniques including behavioural studies in humans [1], single-cell electrophysiology [2], transcranial magnetic stimulation [3], event-related potentials [4] and studies of patients with focal brain injury [5]. A central question is what kind of information controls the search process. Visual search is typically accompanied by a series of eye movements, and investigating the nature and location of fixations helps to identify the kind of information that might control the search process. It has already been demonstrated that objects are fixated if they are visually similar to the target [6]. Also, if an item has been fixated, it is less likely to be returned to on the subsequent saccade. This automatic process is referred to as inhibition of return (IOR [7,8]). Here, we investigated the role of memory for which items had been fixated previously. We found that, during search, subjects often refixated items that had been previously fixated. Although there were fewer return saccades than would be expected by chance, the number of refixations indicated limited functional memory, indeed the memory effects that were present may primarily be a result of IOR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11050390     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00729-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  43 in total

1.  Search for multiple targets: evidence for memory-based control of attention.

Authors:  Yuji Takeda
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

2.  Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search.

Authors:  Walter R Boot; Jason S McCarley; Arthur F Kramer; Mathew S Peterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

3.  Marking rejected distractors: a gaze-contingent technique for measuring memory during search.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

4.  Rapid onset and long-term inhibition of return in the multiple cuing paradigm.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-14

5.  Microsaccades are triggered by low retinal image slip.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Konstantin Mergenthaler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Looking for inhibition of return in pigeons.

Authors:  Brett M Gibson; Igor Juricevic; Sara J Shettleworth; Jay Pratt; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Memory processes in multiple-target visual search.

Authors:  Christof Körner; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-22

8.  Fruitful visual search: inhibition of return in a virtual foraging task.

Authors:  Laura E Thomas; Michael S Ambinder; Brendon Hsieh; Brian Levinthal; James A Crowell; David E Irwin; Arthur F Kramer; Alejandro Lleras; Daniel J Simons; Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

9.  Finding a new target in an old display: evidence for a memory recency effect in visual search.

Authors:  Christof Körner; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

10.  Memory for the search path: evidence for a high-capacity representation of search history.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.