Literature DB >> 17986435

Evidence for adaptive design in human gaze preference.

C A Conway1, B C Jones, L M DeBruine, A C Little.   

Abstract

Many studies have investigated the physical cues that influence face preferences. By contrast, relatively few studies have investigated the effects of facial cues to the direction and valence of others' social interest (i.e. gaze direction and facial expressions) on face preferences. Here we found that participants demonstrated stronger preferences for direct gaze when judging the attractiveness of happy faces than that of disgusted faces, and that this effect of expression on the strength of attraction to direct gaze was particularly pronounced for judgements of opposite-sex faces (study 1). By contrast, no such opposite-sex bias in preferences for direct gaze was observed when participants judged the same faces for likeability (study 2). Collectively, these findings for a context-sensitive opposite-sex bias in preferences for perceiver-directed smiles, but not perceiver-directed disgust, suggest gaze preference functions, at least in part, to facilitate efficient allocation of mating effort, and evince adaptive design in the perceptual mechanisms that underpin face preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17986435      PMCID: PMC2562398          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  17 in total

1.  Reward value of attractiveness and gaze.

Authors:  K K Kampe; C D Frith; R J Dolan; U Frith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Perceived gaze direction and the processing of facial displays of emotion.

Authors:  Reginald B Adams; Robert E Kleck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-11

3.  Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces.

Authors:  B C Jones; D I Perrett; A C Little; L Boothroyd; R E Cornwell; D R Feinberg; B P Tiddeman; S Whiten; R M Pitman; S G Hillier; D M Burt; M R Stirrat; M J Law Smith; F R Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Women's attractiveness judgments of self-resembling faces change across the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; David I Perrett
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  The look of love: gaze shifts and person perception.

Authors:  Malia F Mason; Elizabeth P Tatkow; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-03

7.  Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: context-specific effects of facial resemblance.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Facial attractiveness judgements reflect learning of parental age characteristics.

Authors:  David I Perrett; Ian S Penton-Voak; Anthony C Little; Bernard P Tiddeman; D Michael Burt; Natalie Schmidt; Roz Oxley; Nicholas Kinloch; Louise Barrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Facial resemblance increases the attractiveness of same-sex faces more than other-sex faces.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape.

Authors:  A C Little; B C Jones; I S Penton-Voak; D M Burt; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces.

Authors:  Karl F MacDorman; Robert D Green; Chin-Chang Ho; Clinton T Koch
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2009-05-01

3.  Attention Capture by Direct Gaze is Robust to Context and Task Demands.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  J Nonverbal Behav       Date:  2012-06-01

4.  Neural markers of opposite-sex bias in face processing.

Authors:  Alice Mado Proverbio; Federica Riva; Eleonora Martin; Alberto Zani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-10-18

5.  Women prefer men who use metaphorical language when paying compliments in a romantic context.

Authors:  Zhao Gao; Shan Gao; Lei Xu; Xiaoxiao Zheng; Xiaole Ma; Lizhu Luo; Keith M Kendrick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Combined Effects of Gaze and Orientation of Faces on Person Judgments in Social Situations.

Authors:  Raphaela E Kaisler; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.