Literature DB >> 12061950

Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape.

A C Little1, B C Jones, I S Penton-Voak, D M Burt, D I Perrett.   

Abstract

Secondary sexual characteristics may indicate quality of the immune system and therefore a preference for masculinity may confer genetic benefits to offspring; however, high masculinity may be associated with costs of decreased paternal investment. The current study examined women's preferences for masculinity in male faces by using computer graphics to allow transformation between feminine and masculine versions of individual male faces. We found that preferences for masculinity are increased when women either have a partner or are considering a short-term relationship. Such preferences are potentially adaptive, serving to: (i) maximize parental investment and cooperation in long-term relationships by biasing choices towards feminine faced males, and (ii) maximize possible good-gene benefits of short-term or extra-pair partners by biasing choices towards masculine faced males. We also found that individuals using oral contraception do not show the above effects, indicating that such hormonal intervention potentially disrupts women's choices for evolutionarily relevant benefits from males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12061950      PMCID: PMC1691012          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  11 in total

1.  Menstrual cycle alters face preference.

Authors:  I S Penton-Voak; D I Perrett; D L Castles; T Kobayashi; D M Burt; L K Murray; R Minamisawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review.

Authors:  J H Langlois; L Kalakanis; A J Rubenstein; A Larson; M Hallam; M Smoot
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 3.  Regulation of the human menstrual cycle.

Authors:  N Chabbert Buffet; C Djakoure; S C Maitre; P Bouchard
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.606

4.  The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism.

Authors:  S W Gangestad; J A Simpson
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness.

Authors:  D I Perrett; K J Lee; I Penton-Voak; D Rowland; S Yoshikawa; D M Burt; S P Henzi; D L Castles; S Akamatsu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.

Authors:  A C Little; D M Burt; I S Penton-Voak; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Preference for darker faces in photographs at different phases of the menstrual cycle: preliminary assessment of evidence for a hormonal relationship.

Authors:  P Frost
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1994-08

8.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating.

Authors:  D M Buss; D P Schmitt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity?

Authors:  C Wedekind; S Füri
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness.

Authors:  K Grammer; R Thornhill
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  57 in total

1.  Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces.

Authors:  B C Jones; D I Perrett; A C Little; L Boothroyd; R E Cornwell; D R Feinberg; B P Tiddeman; S Whiten; R M Pitman; S G Hillier; D M Burt; M R Stirrat; M J Law Smith; F R Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; Anthony C Little; Lynda G Boothroyd; David I Perrett; Ian S Penton-Voak; Philip A Cooper; Lars Penke; David R Feinberg; Bernard P Tiddeman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Social transmission of face preferences among humans.

Authors:  Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine; Anthony C Little; Robert P Burriss; David R Feinberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Ailing voters advance attractive congressional candidates.

Authors:  Leslie A Zebrowitz; Robert G Franklin; Rocco Palumbo
Journal:  Evol Psychol       Date:  2015-01-06

7.  Socio-sexuality and episodic memory function in women: further evidence of an adaptive "mating mode".

Authors:  David S Smith; Benedict C Jones; Kevin Allan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08

8.  Evidence for adaptive design in human gaze preference.

Authors:  C A Conway; B C Jones; L M DeBruine; A C Little
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The Relative Importance of Sexual Dimorphism, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Color Cues to Health during Evaluation of Potential Partners' Facial Photographs : A Conjoint Analysis Study.

Authors:  Justin K Mogilski; Lisa L M Welling
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2017-03

10.  Preferences across the menstrual cycle for masculinity and symmetry in photographs of male faces and bodies.

Authors:  Marianne Peters; Leigh W Simmons; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.