Literature DB >> 14629700

Perceived gaze direction and the processing of facial displays of emotion.

Reginald B Adams1, Robert E Kleck.   

Abstract

There is good reason to believe that gaze direction and facial displays of emotion share an information value as signals of approach or avoidance. The combination of these cues in the analysis of social communication, however, has been a virtually neglected area of inquiry. Two studies were conducted to test the prediction that direct gaze would facilitate the processing of facially communicated approach-oriented emotions (e.g., anger and joy), whereas averted gaze would facilitate the processing of facially communicated avoidance-oriented emotions (e.g., fear and sadness). The results of both studies confirmed the central hypothesis and suggest that gaze direction and facial expression are combined in the processing of emotionally relevant facial information.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14629700     DOI: 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1479.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  119 in total

1.  Emotionally meaningful targets enhance orienting triggered by a fearful gazing face.

Authors:  Chris Kelland Friesen; Kimberly M Halvorson; Reiko Graham
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2011-01

2.  Does it make a difference if I have an eye contact with you or with your picture? An ERP study.

Authors:  Laura M Pönkänen; Annemari Alhoniemi; Jukka M Leppänen; Jari K Hietanen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of gaze-expression interactions in face processing and social attention.

Authors:  Reiko Graham; Kevin S Labar
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Interaction between trait anxiety and trait anger predict amygdala reactivity to angry facial expressions in men but not women.

Authors:  Justin M Carré; Patrick M Fisher; Stephen B Manuck; Ahmad R Hariri
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Social transmission of face preferences among humans.

Authors:  Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine; Anthony C Little; Robert P Burriss; David R Feinberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Turning the other cheek: the viewpoint dependence of facial expression after-effects.

Authors:  Christopher P Benton; Peter J Etchells; Gillian Porter; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak; Stavri G Nikolov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Andrew P Bayliss; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Happy and fearful emotion in cues and targets modulate event-related potential indices of gaze-directed attentional orienting.

Authors:  Harlan M Fichtenholtz; Joseph B Hopfinger; Reiko Graham; Jacqueline M Detwiler; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Evidence for adaptive design in human gaze preference.

Authors:  C A Conway; B C Jones; L M DeBruine; A C Little
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Culture, gaze and the neural processing of fear expressions.

Authors:  Reginald B Adams; Robert G Franklin; Nicholas O Rule; Jonathan B Freeman; Kestutis Kveraga; Nouchine Hadjikhani; Sakiko Yoshikawa; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.