Literature DB >> 15451700

Facial resemblance increases the attractiveness of same-sex faces more than other-sex faces.

Lisa M DeBruine1.   

Abstract

Our reactions to facial self-resemblance could reflect either specialized responses to cues of kinship or by-products of the general perceptual mechanisms of face encoding and mere exposure. The adaptive hypothesis predicts differences in reactions to self-resemblance in mating and prosocial contexts, while the by-product hypothesis does not. Using face images that were digitally transformed to resemble participants, I showed that the effects of resemblance on attractiveness judgements depended on both the sex of the judge and the sex of the face being judged: facial resemblance increased attractiveness judgements of same-sex faces more than other-sex faces, despite the use of identical procedures to manipulate resemblance. A control experiment indicated these effects were caused neither by lower resemblance of other-sex faces than same-sex faces, nor by an increased perception of averageness or familiarity of same-sex faces due to prototyping or mere exposure affecting only same-sex faces. The differential impact of self-resemblance on our perception of same-sex and other-sex faces supports the hypothesis that humans use facial resemblance as a cue of kinship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15451700      PMCID: PMC1691833          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  18 in total

1.  Facial attractiveness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Paternal kin discrimination in wild baboons.

Authors:  S C Alberts
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review.

Authors:  J H Langlois; L Kalakanis; A J Rubenstein; A Larson; M Hallam; M Smoot
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 4.  Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.

Authors:  M E Hauber; P W Sherman
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  What is beautiful is good.

Authors:  K Dion; E Berscheid; E Walster
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1972-12

6.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.

Authors:  A C Little; D M Burt; I S Penton-Voak; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society.

Authors:  Peter M Buston; Stephen T Emlen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Facial resemblance enhances trust.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The costs of human inbreeding and their implications for variations at the DNA level.

Authors:  A H Bittles; J V Neel
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  20 in total

1.  Human homogamy in facial characteristics: does a sexual-imprinting-like mechanism play a role?

Authors:  Saori Nojo; Satoshi Tamura; Yasuo Ihara
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-09

Review 2.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Lineage, Sex, and Wealth as Moderators of Kin Investment : Evidence from Inheritances.

Authors:  Gregory D Webster; Angela Bryan; Charles B Crawford; Lisa McCarthy; Brandy H Cohen
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2008-04-29

4.  Opposite-sex siblings decrease attraction, but not prosocial attributions, to self-resembling opposite-sex faces.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; Christopher D Watkins; S Craig Roberts; Anthony C Little; Finlay G Smith; Michelle C Quist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The male advantage in child facial resemblance detection: behavioral and ERP evidence.

Authors:  Haiyan Wu; Suyong Yang; Shiyue Sun; Chao Liu; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 2.083

6.  Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: context-specific effects of facial resemblance.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Evidence for adaptive design in human gaze preference.

Authors:  C A Conway; B C Jones; L M DeBruine; A C Little
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Human ability to detect kinship in strangers' faces: effects of the degree of relatedness.

Authors:  Gwenaël Kaminski; Slimane Dridi; Christian Graff; Edouard Gentaz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Human kin recognition is self- rather than family-referential.

Authors:  Paola Bressan; Guendalina Zucchi
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Human Ability to Recognize Kin Visually Within Primates.

Authors:  Alexandra Alvergne; Elise Huchard; Damien Caillaud; Marie J E Charpentier; Joanna M Setchell; Charlène Ruppli; Delphine Féjan; Laura Martinez; Guy Cowlishaw; Michel Raymond
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.