Literature DB >> 12964976

Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces.

Anthony C Little1, Benedict C Jones.   

Abstract

Symmetrical human faces are attractive. Two explanations have been proposed to account for symmetry preferences: (i) the evolutionary advantage view, which posits that symmetry advertises mate quality and (ii) the perceptual bias view, which posits that symmetry preferences are a consequence of greater ease of processing symmetrical images in the visual system. Here, we show that symmetry preferences are greater when face images are upright than when inverted. This is evidence against a simple perceptual bias view, which suggests symmetry preference should be constant across orientation about a vertical axis. We also show that symmetry is preferred even in familiar faces, a finding that is unexpected by perceptual bias views positing that symmetry is only attractive because it represents a familiar prototype of that particular class of stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12964976      PMCID: PMC1691445          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  18 in total

1.  Facial attractiveness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Revisiting the perception of upside-down faces.

Authors:  J E Murray; E Yong; G Rhodes
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-11

3.  Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-western cultures: in search of biologically based standards of beauty.

Authors:  G Rhodes; S Yoshikawa; A Clark; K Lee; R McKay; S Akamatsu
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful.

Authors:  J P Swaddle; I C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1995-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Evolutionary biology. The secrets of faces.

Authors:  M Enquist; S Ghirlanda
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Bilateral symmetry detection: testing a 'callosal' hypothesis.

Authors:  A M Herbert; G K Humphrey
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: a monozygotic co-twin comparison.

Authors:  L Mealey; R Bridgstock; G C Townsend
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-01

8.  The perception of disoriented figures.

Authors:  I Rock
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.142

9.  Combining visual and verbal information in an impression-formation task.

Authors:  Anita K Lampel; Norman H Anderson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1968-05

10.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.

Authors:  A C Little; D M Burt; I S Penton-Voak; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  22 in total

1.  Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces.

Authors:  B C Jones; D I Perrett; A C Little; L Boothroyd; R E Cornwell; D R Feinberg; B P Tiddeman; S Whiten; R M Pitman; S G Hillier; D M Burt; M R Stirrat; M J Law Smith; F R Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Higher-level mechanisms detect facial symmetry.

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Marianne Peters; Kieran Lee; M Concetta Morrone; David Burr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  [Facial aesthetics part I - the significance of the triangle of yarbus].

Authors:  Ingo N Springer; Oliver Zernial; Jörg Wiltfang; Patrick H Warnke; Hendrik Terheyden; Stefan Wolfart
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-08

4.  The Fusiform Face Area responds automatically to statistical regularities optimal for face categorization.

Authors:  Roberto Caldara; Mohamed L Seghier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Attraction independent of detection suggests special mechanisms for symmetry preferences in human face perception.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Evidence for adaptive design in human gaze preference.

Authors:  C A Conway; B C Jones; L M DeBruine; A C Little
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Do capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella) prefer symmetrical face shapes?

Authors:  Annika Paukner; Lauren J Wooddell; Carmen E Lefevre; Eric Lonsdorf; Elizabeth Lonsdorf
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Coren L Apicella; Frank W Marlowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Haptic aesthetics in the blind: A behavioral and fMRI investigation.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Lora T Likova
Journal:  IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging       Date:  2018
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.