Literature DB >> 15734688

Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces.

B C Jones1, D I Perrett, A C Little, L Boothroyd, R E Cornwell, D R Feinberg, B P Tiddeman, S Whiten, R M Pitman, S G Hillier, D M Burt, M R Stirrat, M J Law Smith, F R Moore.   

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrating changes in women's face preferences have emphasized increased attraction to cues to possible indirect benefits (e.g. heritable immunity to infection) that coincides with periods of high fertility (e.g. the late follicular phase of the menstrual cycle). By contrast, here we show that when choosing between composite faces with raised or lowered apparent health, women's preferences for faces that are perceived as healthy are (i) stronger during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle than during the late follicular, fertile phase, (ii) stronger in pregnant women than in non-pregnant women and (iii) stronger in women using oral contraceptives than in women with natural menstrual cycles. Change in preference for male faces was greater for short- than long-term relationships. These findings indicate raised progesterone level is associated with increased attraction to facial cues associated with possible direct benefits (e.g. low risk of infection) and suggest that women's face preferences are influenced by adaptations that compensate for weakened immune system responses during pregnancy and reduce the risk of infection disrupting foetal development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15734688      PMCID: PMC1634990          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  17 in total

1.  Menstrual cycle alters face preference.

Authors:  I S Penton-Voak; D I Perrett; D L Castles; T Kobayashi; D M Burt; L K Murray; R Minamisawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health?

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Janelle Chan; Leslie A Zebrowitz; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Luteal phase immunosuppression and meat eating.

Authors:  D M Fessler
Journal:  Riv Biol       Date:  2001 Sep-Dec

Review 5.  Morning sickness: a mechanism for protecting mother and embryo.

Authors:  S M Flaxman; P W Sherman
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.875

6.  Luteal phase progesterone excretion in ovulatory women with polycystic ovaries.

Authors:  Rosanne Joseph-Horne; Helen Mason; Sari Batty; Davinia White; Stephen Hillier; Martha Urquhart; Stephen Franks
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Facial attractiveness judgements reflect learning of parental age characteristics.

Authors:  David I Perrett; Ian S Penton-Voak; Anthony C Little; Bernard P Tiddeman; D Michael Burt; Natalie Schmidt; Roz Oxley; Nicholas Kinloch; Louise Barrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.

Authors:  A C Little; D M Burt; I S Penton-Voak; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Soluble adhesion molecules in serum throughout the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Nigel Bonello; Robert J Norman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape.

Authors:  A C Little; B C Jones; I S Penton-Voak; D M Burt; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  25 in total

1.  Social transmission of face preferences among humans.

Authors:  Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine; Anthony C Little; Robert P Burriss; David R Feinberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Life history of female preferences for male faces: a comparison of pubescent girls, nonpregnant and pregnant young women, and middle-aged women.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kościński
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2011-12

4.  Ants avoid superinfections by performing risk-adjusted sanitary care.

Authors:  Matthias Konrad; Christopher D Pull; Sina Metzler; Katharina Seif; Elisabeth Naderlinger; Anna V Grasse; Sylvia Cremer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Mate preferences and infectious disease: theoretical considerations and evidence in humans.

Authors:  Joshua M Tybur; Steven W Gangestad
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Evidence for adaptive design in human gaze preference.

Authors:  C A Conway; B C Jones; L M DeBruine; A C Little
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Coren L Apicella; Frank W Marlowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Females and attention to eye gaze: effects of the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Felicity D A Wolohan; Sarah J V Bennett; Trevor J Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter-gatherers.

Authors:  Coren L Apicella; David R Feinberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Preferences across the menstrual cycle for masculinity and symmetry in photographs of male faces and bodies.

Authors:  Marianne Peters; Leigh W Simmons; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.