Literature DB >> 16024346

Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: context-specific effects of facial resemblance.

Lisa M DeBruine1.   

Abstract

If humans are sensitive to the costs and benefits of favouring kin in different circumstances, a strong prediction is that cues of relatedness will have a positive effect on prosocial feelings, but a negative effect on sexual attraction. Indeed, positive effects of facial resemblance (a potential cue of kinship) have been demonstrated in prosocial contexts. Alternatively, such effects may be owing to a general preference for familiar stimuli. Here, I show that subtly manipulated images of other-sex faces were judged as more trustworthy by the participants they were made to resemble than by control participants. In contrast, the effects of resemblance on attractiveness were significantly lower. In the context of a long-term relationship, where both prosocial regard and sexual appeal are important criteria, facial resemblance had no effect. In the context of a short-term relationship, where sexual appeal is the dominant criterion, facial resemblance decreased attractiveness. The results provide evidence against explanations implicating a general preference for familiar-looking stimuli and suggest instead that facial resemblance is a kinship cue to which humans modulate responses in a context-sensitive manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16024346      PMCID: PMC1564091          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.3003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  17 in total

1.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects.

Authors:  D A Leopold; A J O'Toole; T Vetter; V Blanz
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The attractiveness of nonface averages: implications for an evolutionary explanation of the attractiveness of average faces.

Authors:  J Halberstadt; G Rhodes
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-07

Review 3.  Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics.

Authors:  A Bittles
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 4.  Does inbreeding lead to decreased human fertility?

Authors:  A H Bittles; J C Grant; S G Sullivan; R Hussain
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.533

5.  The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism.

Authors:  S W Gangestad; J A Simpson
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.579

6.  Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  I S Penton-Voak; A C Little; B C Jones; D M Burt; B P Tiddeman; D I Perrett
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Facial attractiveness judgements reflect learning of parental age characteristics.

Authors:  David I Perrett; Ian S Penton-Voak; Anthony C Little; Bernard P Tiddeman; D Michael Burt; Natalie Schmidt; Roz Oxley; Nicholas Kinloch; Louise Barrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Facial resemblance enhances trust.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The costs of human inbreeding and their implications for variations at the DNA level.

Authors:  A H Bittles; J V Neel
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape.

Authors:  A C Little; B C Jones; I S Penton-Voak; D M Burt; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The modular neuroarchitecture of social judgments on faces.

Authors:  Danilo Bzdok; Robert Langner; Felix Hoffstaedter; Bruce I Turetsky; Karl Zilles; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Lineage, Sex, and Wealth as Moderators of Kin Investment : Evidence from Inheritances.

Authors:  Gregory D Webster; Angela Bryan; Charles B Crawford; Lisa McCarthy; Brandy H Cohen
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2008-04-29

4.  Is friendship akin to kinship?

Authors:  Joshua M Ackerman; Douglas T Kenrick; Mark Schaller
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.178

5.  Opposite-sex siblings decrease attraction, but not prosocial attributions, to self-resembling opposite-sex faces.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; Christopher D Watkins; S Craig Roberts; Anthony C Little; Finlay G Smith; Michelle C Quist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The male advantage in child facial resemblance detection: behavioral and ERP evidence.

Authors:  Haiyan Wu; Suyong Yang; Shiyue Sun; Chao Liu; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  Effects of stress on human mating preferences: stressed individuals prefer dissimilar mates.

Authors:  Johanna Lass-Hennemann; Christian E Deuter; Linn K Kuehl; André Schulz; Terry D Blumenthal; Hartmut Schachinger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Allocentric kin recognition is not affected by facial inversion.

Authors:  Maria F Dal Martello; Lisa M DeBruine; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Evidence for adaptive design in human gaze preference.

Authors:  C A Conway; B C Jones; L M DeBruine; A C Little
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Human Ability to Recognize Kin Visually Within Primates.

Authors:  Alexandra Alvergne; Elise Huchard; Damien Caillaud; Marie J E Charpentier; Joanna M Setchell; Charlène Ruppli; Delphine Féjan; Laura Martinez; Guy Cowlishaw; Michel Raymond
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.