Literature DB >> 21536551

Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Anthony C Little1, Benedict C Jones, Lisa M DeBruine.   

Abstract

Face preferences affect a diverse range of critical social outcomes, from mate choices and decisions about platonic relationships to hiring decisions and decisions about social exchange. Firstly, we review the facial characteristics that influence attractiveness judgements of faces (e.g. symmetry, sexually dimorphic shape cues, averageness, skin colour/texture and cues to personality) and then review several important sources of individual differences in face preferences (e.g. hormone levels and fertility, own attractiveness and personality, visual experience, familiarity and imprinting, social learning). The research relating to these issues highlights flexible, sophisticated systems that support and promote adaptive responses to faces that appear to function to maximize the benefits of both our mate choices and more general decisions about other types of social partners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21536551      PMCID: PMC3130383          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  133 in total

1.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes; Kai-Markus Müller; Linda Jeffery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Changes in women's mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle.

Authors:  Steven W Gangestad; Christine E Garver-Apgar; Jeffry A Simpson; Alita J Cousins
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-01

3.  Sex-typicality and attractiveness: are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive?

Authors:  G Rhodes; C Hickford; L Jeffery
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2000-02

4.  Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high.

Authors:  B C Jones; A C Little; L Boothroyd; L M Debruine; D R Feinberg; M J Law Smith; R E Cornwell; F R Moore; D I Perrett
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.587

5.  Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgment in developmental perspective.

Authors:  R Kowner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.

Authors:  A C Little; D M Burt; I S Penton-Voak; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Facial resemblance enhances trust.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males.

Authors:  John P Swaddle; Gillian W Reierson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Women's preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Steven W Gangestad; Jeffry A Simpson; Alita J Cousins; Christine E Garver-Apgar; P Niels Christensen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-03

10.  Kin recognition signals in adult faces.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Finlay G Smith; Benedict C Jones; S Craig Roberts; Marion Petrie; Tim D Spector
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  126 in total

1.  The effect of incobotulinumtoxin a and dermal filler treatment on perception of age, health, and attractiveness of female faces.

Authors:  Bernhard Fink; Michael Prager
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2014-01

2.  Rating nasolabial appearance on three-dimensional images in cleft lip and palate: a comparison with standard photographs.

Authors:  Adam Stebel; Dries Desmedt; Ewald Bronkhorst; Mette A Kuijpers; Piotr S Fudalej
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Morphometric facial analysis: a methodology to create lateral facial images.

Authors:  Koohyar Karimi; Zlatko Devcic; Natalie Popenko; Udochukwu Oyoyo; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-06-18

4.  The Conundrum of Modern Art : Prestige-Driven Coevolutionary Aesthetics Trumps Evolutionary Aesthetics among Art Experts.

Authors:  Jan Verpooten; Siegfried Dewitte
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2017-03

5.  Evolutionary behavioral genetics.

Authors:  Brendan P Zietsch; Teresa R de Candia; Matthew C Keller
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2015-04

Review 6.  Human colour in mate choice and competition.

Authors:  Hannah M Rowland; Robert P Burriss
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Psychobiological Responses Reveal Audiovisual Noise Differentially Challenges Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Bonnie Brown; Kelsey Mankel; Caitlin Nelms Price
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Using Infrared Thermography to Assess Emotional Responses to Infants.

Authors:  Gianluca Esposito; Jun Nakazawa; Shota Ogawa; Rita Stival; Diane L Putnick; Marc H Bornstein
Journal:  Early Child Dev Care       Date:  2014-07-11

9.  Socio-sexuality and episodic memory function in women: further evidence of an adaptive "mating mode".

Authors:  David S Smith; Benedict C Jones; Kevin Allan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08

10.  Women can judge sexual unfaithfulness from unfamiliar men's faces.

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Grace Morley; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.