Literature DB >> 17953706

The outcome of loop ileostomy closure: a prospective study.

L A Williams1, P M Sagar, P J Finan, D Burke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of a loop ileostomy is an effective method to protect pelvic anastomoses, although there is some debate as to the routine use of a stoma. A second operation is required to close the stoma, with potential complications.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess prospectively the morbidity of closure of loop ileostomy.
METHOD: All patients scheduled for loop ileostomy closure over a 12-month period were included. The patient demographics, operative technique, complications and length of stay were recorded prospectively.
RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients (28 males and 22 females) with a median age (interquartile range, IQR) of 56 (42-73) years underwent closure of loop ileostomy, at a median time (IQR) of 29 (18-48) weeks after formation. Twelve patients (24%) developed complications: six (12%) had intestinal obstruction of which one required a laparotomy, four (8%) had wound infections of which one required re-operation, one (2%) had an ileal anastomotic leak and subsequently died and one (2%) died from a myocardial infarction. The median length (IQR) of hospital stay was 8 (7-10) days.
CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that a quarter of patients develop complications after loop ileostomy closure. The majority of these are minor. Methods to reduce the number of complications, such as optimum time for closure and distal limb irrigation techniques, need to be studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17953706     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01385.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  30 in total

1.  Loop ileostomy closure: comparison of cost effectiveness between suture and stapler.

Authors:  Karoline Horisberger; Guido Beldi; Daniel Candinas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Is there an Advantage to a Minimally Invasive Approach?

Authors:  Monica T Young; Grace S Hwang; Gopal Menon; Timothy F Feldmann; Mehraneh D Jafari; Fariba Jafari; Eden Perez; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Henry S Tilney; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Santhini Jeyarajah; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The effect of peri-stomal infiltration with bupivacaine/epinephrine on post-operative pain, nausea and ease of surgery in reversal of loop ileostomies.

Authors:  Kawan Shalli; C Watson; Lynn McCaffer; David Clough; Vimty Muir; Angus Macdonald
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Comparison of surgical techniques for stoma closure: A retrospective study of purse-string skin closure versus conventional skin closure following ileostomy and colostomy reversal.

Authors:  Yuma Wada; Norikatsu Miyoshi; Masayuki Ohue; Shingo Noura; Shiki Fujino; Keijirou Sugimura; Hirofumi Akita; Masaaki Motoori; Kunihito Gotoh; Hidenori Takahashi; Shogo Kobayashi; Takeshi Ohmori; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Masahiko Yano
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-06

6.  Influence of neoadjuvant radiotherapy on anastomotic leak after restorative resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pasha J Nisar; Ian C Lavery; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Wound infection following stoma takedown: primary skin closure versus subcuticular purse-string suture.

Authors:  Thao T Marquez; Dimitrios Christoforidis; Anasooya Abraham; Robert D Madoff; David A Rothenberger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Identifying causes for high readmission rates after stoma reversal.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Zhamak Khorgami; Brian Swendseid; Sadaf Khan; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Postoperative management after loop ileostomy closure: are we keeping patients in hospital too long?

Authors:  W Baraza; J Wild; W Barber; S Brown
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Factors predicting stomal wound closure infection rates.

Authors:  N Mirbagheri; J Dark; S Skinner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.