Literature DB >> 20056062

Postoperative management after loop ileostomy closure: are we keeping patients in hospital too long?

W Baraza1, J Wild, W Barber, S Brown.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have shown that closure of loop ileostomy can be performed in the day-case setting, reducing the length and cost of hospitalisation. By analysing our patients who have undergone reversal, we aimed to determine the length of hospital stay and potential factors behind stays beyond 24 h. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A database of patients undergoing closure of loop ileostomy at one colorectal unit was examined. The times taken to discharge, morbidity and re-admission rates were recorded.
RESULTS: Eighty patients underwent reversal of ileostomy between January 2001 and January 2006. Median age was 63 years (range, 22-81 years). The median length of stay was 4 days (range, 2-32 days). The median length of stay in patients without complications was 4 days. Many appeared able to be discharged earlier. Seventy-two patients (90%) were able to tolerate a solid diet within 48 h and 54 (67.5%) had bowel function within 3 days. Six patients went home before bowel function; none of these were re-admitted. Twenty patients (25%) developed complications, which included wound infection (8%), small bowel obstruction/ileus (6%), enterocutaneous fistula (1%), anastomotic leak (1%), and late abdominal wall abscess (1%). Of the patients, 16% stayed longer than 5 days despite having no postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients undergoing loop ileostomy reversal at our institution can be discharged earlier than they are at present. Support in the community and the implementation of modified UK day-case surgery protocols are suggested to help shorten patients' length of stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20056062      PMCID: PMC3024618          DOI: 10.1308/003588410X12518836439209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  13 in total

1.  Same-day surgery ileostomy closure?

Authors:  M R Moran
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients.

Authors:  Kutt-Sing Wong; Feza H Remzi; Emre Gorgun; Susana Arrigain; James M Church; Miriam Preen; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques.

Authors:  G Lahat; H Tulchinsky; G Goldman; J M Klauzner; M Rabau
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Loop ileostomy closure at an ambulatory surgery facility: a safe and cost-effective alternative to routine hospitalization.

Authors:  Matthew F Kalady; Ryan C Fields; Stephen Klein; Karen C Nielsen; Christopher R Mantyh; Kirk A Ludwig; Karen C Nielson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  H Hasegawa; S Radley; D G Morton; M R Keighley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Defunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity.

Authors:  S N Amin; M A Memon; N C Armitage; J H Scholefield
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Selective serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for postoperative nausea and vomiting: are they all the same?

Authors:  Tong J Gan
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  The outcome of loop ileostomy closure: a prospective study.

Authors:  L A Williams; P M Sagar; P J Finan; D Burke
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Comparison of handsewn with stapled loop ileostomy closures.

Authors:  T L Hull; I Kobe; V W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Loop ileostomy is a safe option for fecal diversion.

Authors:  S D Wexner; D A Taranow; O B Johansen; F Itzkowitz; N Daniel; J J Nogueras; D G Jagelman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  14 in total

1.  Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Paul Savage; Marylise Boutros; Tara Landry; Pauline Reynier; Nancy Morin; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rudolf Mennigen; Wiebke Sewald; Norbert Senninger; Emile Rijcken
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Influence of neoadjuvant radiotherapy on anastomotic leak after restorative resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pasha J Nisar; Ian C Lavery; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Closure of loop ileostomy: potentially a daycase procedure?

Authors:  O Peacock; C I Law; P W Collins; W J Speake; J N Lund; G M Tierney
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Twenty-three-hour stay loop ileostomy closures: a pilot study.

Authors:  O Peacock; A Bhalla; J A Simpson; S Gold; N G Hurst; W J Speake; G M Tierney; J N Lund
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  [Diagnosis and definition of anastomotic leakage from the surgeon's perspective].

Authors:  T Welsch; M von Frankenberg; J Schmidt; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Short-stay compared to long-stay admissions for loop ileostomy reversals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victoria Archer; Zacharie Cloutier; Annie Berg; Tyler McKechnie; Wojtek Wiercioch; Cagla Eskicioglu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Identifying causes for high readmission rates after stoma reversal.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Zhamak Khorgami; Brian Swendseid; Sadaf Khan; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications Following Diverting Loop Ileostomy Takedown.

Authors:  Anuradha R Bhama; Farwa Batool; Stacey D Collins; Jane Ferraro; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Review of an emergency general surgery process improvement program at a verified military trauma center.

Authors:  Joseph Bozzay; Matthew Bradley; Angela Kindvall; Ashley Humphries; Elliot Jessie; Judy Logeman; Jeffrey Bailey; Eric Elster; Carlos Rodriguez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.