Literature DB >> 23076288

Factors predicting stomal wound closure infection rates.

N Mirbagheri1, J Dark, S Skinner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stoma closure is associated with high wound infection rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for infection rates in such wounds, with particular emphasis on assessing the importance of the stomal wound closure technique.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 142 patients who had undergone ileostomy or colostomy closure between 2002 and 2011 was performed. Postoperative outcome as measured by wound infection rate was recorded. Three different closure techniques were identified: primary closure (PC), primary closure with penrose drain (PCP) and purse-string circumferential wound approximation technique (PSC). Other factors such as age, sex, ASA score, type of prophylactic antibiotics used, diabetes, smoking and obesity were also analysed. All other techniques were excluded.
RESULTS: Our series consisted of 142 stomal closures (90 ileostomy and 52 colostomy closures). The patients had a median age of 63.5 years with an interquartile range of 50.1-73.2 years. The overall wound infection rate was 10.7%. PC, PCP and PSC were associated with wound infection rates of 17.9, 10.5 and 3.6%, respectively. Compared to PSC, PC and PCP were associated with significantly higher wound infection rates (p = 0.027 and p = 0.068, respectively). Obesity was a significant risk factor for wound infection (p = 0.024). Use of triple-agent antibiotics prophylactically had a protective effect on the infection rate (p = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: To reduce stomal wound closure infection rates, we recommend institution of closure techniques other than PC with or without a drain. Risk factors such as obesity should be addressed, and prophylactic triple antibiotics should be administered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23076288     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0908-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  20 in total

1.  Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown.

Authors:  P T Phang; J M Hain; J J Perez-Ramirez; R D Madoff; B T Gemlo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients.

Authors:  Kutt-Sing Wong; Feza H Remzi; Emre Gorgun; Susana Arrigain; James M Church; Miriam Preen; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques.

Authors:  G Lahat; H Tulchinsky; G Goldman; J M Klauzner; M Rabau
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Loop ileostomy morbidity: timing of closure matters.

Authors:  Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Angelita Habr-Gama; Victor E Seid; Igor Proscurshim; Afonso H Sousa; Desidério R Kiss; Marcelo Linhares; Manuela Sapucahy; Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  W S Tan; C L Tang; L Shi; K W Eu
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Complications following closure of loop ileostomy.

Authors:  L J Mann; P J Stewart; R J Goodwin; P H Chapuis; E L Bokey
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1991-07

7.  A technique for wound closure that minimizes sepsis after stoma closure.

Authors:  Christopher Derek Sutton; Nigel Williams; Leslie-Jayne Marshall; Geraint Lloyd; William Michael Thomas
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.872

8.  The outcome of loop ileostomy closure: a prospective study.

Authors:  L A Williams; P M Sagar; P J Finan; D Burke
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  The cuticular purse string suture: a modified purse string suture for the partial closure of round postoperative wounds.

Authors:  Philip R Cohen; Paul T Martinelli; Keith E Schulze; Bruce R Nelson
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.736

Review 10.  Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: effect of timing and technique on ease and safety.

Authors:  J O Keck; B T Collopy; P J Ryan; R Fink; J R Mackay; R J Woods
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  11 in total

1.  Meta-analysis and single-center experience on the protective effect of negative suction drains on wound healing after stoma reversal.

Authors:  Philipp-Alexander Neumann; Stefan Reischl; Felix Berg; Carsten Jäger; Helmut Friess; Daniel Reim; Güralp O Ceyhan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Comparison of surgical techniques for stoma closure: A retrospective study of purse-string skin closure versus conventional skin closure following ileostomy and colostomy reversal.

Authors:  Yuma Wada; Norikatsu Miyoshi; Masayuki Ohue; Shingo Noura; Shiki Fujino; Keijirou Sugimura; Hirofumi Akita; Masaaki Motoori; Kunihito Gotoh; Hidenori Takahashi; Shogo Kobayashi; Takeshi Ohmori; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Masahiko Yano
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-06

Review 3.  Italian guidelines for the surgical management of enteral stomas in adults.

Authors:  F Ferrara; D Parini; A Bondurri; M Veltri; M Barbierato; F Pata; F Cattaneo; A Tafuri; C Forni; G Roveron; G Rizzo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Purse-string closure technique reduces the incidence of incisional hernias following the reversal of temporary ileostomy.

Authors:  Mazen A Juratli; Nour-Eldin A Nour-Eldin; Hans Ackermann; Nils Habbe; Sabine Hannes; Wolf O Bechstein; Guido Woeste
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Increased postoperative complications after protective ileostomy closure delay: An institutional study.

Authors:  Ines Rubio-Perez; Miguel Leon; Daniel Pastor; Joaquin Diaz Dominguez; Ramon Cantero
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-27

6.  Necessity of subcutaneous suction drains in ileostomy reversal (DRASTAR)-a randomized, controlled bi-centered trial.

Authors:  J C Lauscher; V Schneider; L D Lee; A Stroux; H J Buhr; M E Kreis; J P Ritz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 7.  Purse-string approximation is superior to primary skin closure following stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D P McCartan; J P Burke; S R Walsh; J C Coffey
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Purse-string approximation vs. primary closure with a drain for stoma reversal surgery: results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Kunihiko Amano; Hideyuki Ishida; Kensuke Kumamoto; Norimichi Okada; Satoshi Hatano; Noriyasu Chika; Yusuke Tajima; Tomonori Ohsawa; Masaru Yokoyama; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Erito Mochiki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Evidence-based adoption of purse-string skin closure for stoma wounds.

Authors:  Nilotpal Behuria; Jayant Kumar Banerjee; Sita Ram Ghosh; Shrirang Vasant Kulkarni; Ramanathan Saranga Bharathi
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2019-06-03

10.  Temporary closure of colostomy with suture before colostomy takedown improves the postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  Wan-Hsiang Hu; Ko-Chao Lee; Kai-Lung Tsai; Hong-Hwa Chen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.