Literature DB >> 20703459

Wound infection following stoma takedown: primary skin closure versus subcuticular purse-string suture.

Thao T Marquez1, Dimitrios Christoforidis, Anasooya Abraham, Robert D Madoff, David A Rothenberger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stoma closure has been associated with a high rate of surgical site infection (SSI) and the ideal stoma-site skin closure technique is still debated. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of SSI following primary skin closure (PC) versus a skin-approximating, subcuticular purse-string closure (APS).
METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing stoma closure between 2002 and 2007 by two surgeons at a single tertiary-care institution were retrospectively assessed. Patients who had a new stoma created at the same site or those without wound closure were excluded. The end point was SSI, determined according to current CDC guidelines, at the stoma closure site and/or the midline laparotomy incision.
RESULTS: There were 61 patients in the PC group (surgeon A: 58 of 61) and 17 in the APS group (surgeon B: 16 of 17). The two groups were similar in baseline and intraoperative characteristics, except that patients in the PC group were more often diagnosed with benign disease (p = 0.0156) and more often had a stapled anastomosis (p = 0.002). The overall SSI rate was 14 of 78 (18%). All SSIs occurred in the PC group (14 of 61 vs. 0 of 17, p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that a skin-approximating closure with a subcuticular purse-string of the stoma site leads to less SSI than a primary closure. Randomized studies are needed to confirm our findings and assess additional end points such as healing time, cost, and patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20703459     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0753-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  23 in total

1.  Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown.

Authors:  P T Phang; J M Hain; J J Perez-Ramirez; R D Madoff; B T Gemlo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors:  A J Mangram; T C Horan; M L Pearson; L C Silver; W R Jarvis
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 3.  Complications of construction and closure of temporary loop ileostomy.

Authors:  Orit Kaidar-Person; Benjamin Person; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques.

Authors:  G Lahat; H Tulchinsky; G Goldman; J M Klauzner; M Rabau
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Morbidity of ileostomy and colostomy closure: impact of surgical technique and perioperative treatment.

Authors:  K P Riesener; W Lehnen; M Höfer; R Kasperk; J C Braun; V Schumpelick
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Complications of colostomy closure.

Authors:  S E Parks; P R Hastings
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  P Lewis; D C Bartolo
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Complications of colostomy closure.

Authors:  D M Pittman; L E Smith
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  A technique for wound closure that minimizes sepsis after stoma closure.

Authors:  Christopher Derek Sutton; Nigel Williams; Leslie-Jayne Marshall; Geraint Lloyd; William Michael Thomas
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.872

10.  Stoma closure and wound infection: an evaluation of risk factors.

Authors:  D J Hackam; O D Rotstein
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.089

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Hand suture versus stapler for closure of loop ileostomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Thorsten Löffler; Inga Rossion; Käthe Gooßen; Daniel Saure; Jürgen Weitz; Alexis Ulrich; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Comparison of surgical techniques for stoma closure: A retrospective study of purse-string skin closure versus conventional skin closure following ileostomy and colostomy reversal.

Authors:  Yuma Wada; Norikatsu Miyoshi; Masayuki Ohue; Shingo Noura; Shiki Fujino; Keijirou Sugimura; Hirofumi Akita; Masaaki Motoori; Kunihito Gotoh; Hidenori Takahashi; Shogo Kobayashi; Takeshi Ohmori; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Masahiko Yano
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-06

3.  Cosmetic and functional outcome after stoma site skin closure in children.

Authors:  Lisa Ortqvist; Markus Almström; Maria Ojmyr-Joelsson; Helena Wigander; Agneta Währner; Tomas Wester
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-05-29       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Risk factor for the development of surgical site infection following ileostomy reversal: a single-center report.

Authors:  Shuangming Lin; Dongbo Xu; Yibin Zhu; Jianxun Chen
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-08-24

Review 5.  Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure techniques in stoma closure: a comprehensive meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Shahab Hajibandeh; Shahin Hajibandeh; Andrew Kennedy-Dalby; Sheik Rehman; Reza Arsalani Zadeh
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Factors predicting stomal wound closure infection rates.

Authors:  N Mirbagheri; J Dark; S Skinner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 7.  Purse-string approximation is superior to primary skin closure following stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D P McCartan; J P Burke; S R Walsh; J C Coffey
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Evidence-based adoption of purse-string skin closure for stoma wounds.

Authors:  Nilotpal Behuria; Jayant Kumar Banerjee; Sita Ram Ghosh; Shrirang Vasant Kulkarni; Ramanathan Saranga Bharathi
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2019-06-03

9.  Clinical trial on the incidence of wound infection and patient satisfaction after stoma closure: comparison of two skin closure techniques.

Authors:  Sang Il Yoon; Sun Mi Bae; Hwan Namgung; Dong Guk Park
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2015-02-28

10.  Purse-String Versus Linear Conventional Skin Wound Closure of an Ileostomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Mina Alvandipour; Babak Gharedaghi; Hamed Khodabakhsh; Mohammad Yasin Karami
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2016-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.