Literature DB >> 17934725

The intermanual transfer of anticipatory force control in precision grip lifting is not influenced by the perception of weight.

Erik C Chang1, J Randall Flanagan, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

Passing objects from one hand to the other occurs frequently in our daily life. What kind of information about the weight of the object is transferred between the holding and lifting hand? To examine this, we asked people to hold (and heft) an object in one hand and then pick it up with the other. The objects were presented in the context of a size-weight illusion: that is, two objects of different sizes but the same weight were used. One group of participants held one of the objects in their left hand and then picked it up with their right. Another group of participants simply picked up the objects from a table. Thus, the former group had on-line information about the weight of the object, whereas the latter did not. Both groups showed a strong and equivalent size-weight illusion throughout the experiment. At the same time, the group that lifted the objects from the hefting hand applied equal grip force to the small and large object right from the start; in contrast, the group lifting the objects from the table, initially applied more grip force to the large than to the small object before eventually applying the same force to both. In two additional groups, a delay period was imposed between the lifting of the first and the second hands. The force parameters employed by these last two groups were virtually identical to those used by the group that lifted the object directly from the other hand. These results suggest that the initial calibration of grip force uses veridical information about the weight of the object provided by the other hand. This veridical information about weight is available on-line and is retained in memory for later access. The perceived weight of the object is basically ignored in forming grasping forces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17934725     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1156-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Charpentier (1891) on the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  D J Murray; R R Ellis; C A Bandomir; H E Ross
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-11

2.  Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics.

Authors:  Y Hu; M A Goodale
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Feedforward postural stabilization in a distal bimanual unloading task.

Authors:  P Kaluzny; M Wiesendanger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The integration of haptically acquired size information in the programming of precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Asymmetric control of bilateral isometric finger forces.

Authors:  H Henningsen; B Ende-Henningsen; A M Gordon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects.

Authors:  A M Gordon; G Westling; K J Cole; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Formation and lateralization of internal representations underlying motor commands during precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; N Iwasaki
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  17 in total

1.  Perceiving and acting upon weight illusions in the absence of somatosensory information.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Elizabeth Evgenia Michelakakis; Jonathan Cole
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Bayesian and "anti-Bayesian" biases in sensory integration for action and perception in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Grasping future events: explicit knowledge of the availability of visual feedback fails to reliably influence prehension.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Lisa M Lambert; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Transfer of learning between hands to handle a novel object in old age.

Authors:  Pranav J Parikh; Kelly J Cole
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Intermanual transfer and proprioceptive recalibration following training with translated visual feedback of the hand.

Authors:  Ahmed A Mostafa; Danielle Salomonczyk; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Somatosensory feedback refines the perception of hand shape with respect to external constraints.

Authors:  S A Winges
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  The influence of competing perceptual and motor priors in the context of the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Multisensory information about changing object properties can be used to quickly correct predictive force scaling for object lifting.

Authors:  Vonne van Polanen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  The impact of left hemisphere stroke on force control with familiar and novel objects: neuroanatomic substrates and relationship to apraxia.

Authors:  Amanda M Dawson; Laurel J Buxbaum; Susan V Duff
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 10.  The contributions of vision and haptics to reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.