Literature DB >> 24468724

Intermanual transfer and proprioceptive recalibration following training with translated visual feedback of the hand.

Ahmed A Mostafa1, Danielle Salomonczyk, Erin K Cressman, Denise Y P Henriques.   

Abstract

Reaching with visual feedback that is misaligned with respect to the actual hand's location leads to changes in reach trajectories (i.e., visuomotor adaptation). Previous studies have also demonstrated that when training to reach with misaligned visual feedback of the hand, the opposite hand also partially adapts, providing evidence of intermanual transfer. Moreover, our laboratory has shown that visuomotor adaptation to a misaligned hand cursor, either translated or rotated relative to the hand, also leads to changes in felt hand position (what we call proprioceptive recalibration), such that subjects' estimate of felt hand position relative to both visual and non-visual reference markers (e.g., body midline) shifts in the direction of the visuomotor distortion. In the present study, we first determined the extent that motor adaptation to a translated cursor leads to transfer to the opposite hand, and whether this transfer differs across the dominant and non-dominant hands. Second, we looked to establish whether changes in hand proprioception that occur with the trained hand following adaptation also transfer to the untrained hand. We found intermanual motor transfer to the left untrained (non-dominant) hand after subjects trained their right (dominant) hand to reach with translated visual feedback of their hand. Motor transfer from the left trained to the right untrained hand was not observed. Despite finding changes in felt hand position in both trained hands, we did not find similar evidence of proprioceptive recalibration in the right or left untrained hands. Taken together, our results suggest that unlike visuomotor adaptation, proprioceptive recalibration does not transfer between hands and is specific only to the arm exposed to the distortion.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24468724     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3833-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Transfer of sensorimotor adaptation between different movement categories.

Authors:  Sylvie Abeele; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Evidence for an eye-centered spherical representation of the visuomotor map.

Authors:  P Vetter; S J Goodbody; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Visuomotor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration in older adults.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Danielle Salomonczyk; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Generalization to local remappings of the visuomotor coordinate transformation.

Authors:  Z Ghahramani; D M Wolpert; M I Jordan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Motor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

7.  Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  A PET study of visuospatial attention.

Authors:  M Corbetta; F M Miezin; G L Shulman; S E Petersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Adaptive psychophysical procedures.

Authors:  B Treutwein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The intermanual transfer of anticipatory force control in precision grip lifting is not influenced by the perception of weight.

Authors:  Erik C Chang; J Randall Flanagan; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  18 in total

1.  Intermanual transfer characteristics of dynamic learning: direction, coordinate frame, and consolidation of interlimb generalization.

Authors:  Christian Stockinger; Benjamin Thürer; Anne Focke; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  To transfer or not to transfer? Kinematics and laterality quotient predict interlimb transfer of motor learning.

Authors:  Hannah Z Lefumat; Jean-Louis Vercher; R Chris Miall; Jonathan Cole; Frank Buloup; Lionel Bringoux; Christophe Bourdin; Fabrice R Sarlegna
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Generalization patterns for reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration differ after visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Generalization of reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration at different distances in the workspace.

Authors:  Ahmed A Mostafa; Rozbeh Kamran-Disfani; Golsa Bahari-Kashani; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Retention of proprioceptive recalibration following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Nilufer Nourouzpour; Danielle Salomonczyk; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Proprioceptive recalibration arises slowly compared to reach adaptation.

Authors:  Basel Zbib; Denise Y P Henriques; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Adaptation to proprioceptive targets following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jenna C Flannigan; Ruth J Posthuma; Jesse N Lombardo; Chelsea Murray; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Handedness influences intermanual transfer in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) but not rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Emily R Boeving; Agnès Lacreuse; William D Hopkins; Kimberley A Phillips; Melinda A Novak; Eliza L Nelson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Sensory Plasticity in Human Motor Learning.

Authors:  David J Ostry; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following terminal visual feedback of the hand.

Authors:  Victoria Barkley; Danielle Salomonczyk; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.